Then it's the race of the element of fire! Salamanders, efreets, fire elementals, sphinxes, phoenixes...

:confused: What is the connection between Sphinxes and the fire race?

Added 12 minutes ago

And there could live, for example, wandering orcs, outcast elves, gray paladins, healing liches, and someone else. And they would fight only for themselves. And for money.:cool:

Great idea! A race that didn't succumb to the general trend of pompous wars for world (Universal?) domination between Good and Evil is great. This race will never have low morale, because its warriors fight not for a fictional power over the universe, but for their own pleasure. This race simply must become a decoration of the game, a kind of opposition to the power-hungry representatives of other peoples. And regarding the composition of the race: let's figure it out together!!!

Added 25 minutes ago

No. The race of neutrals must be neutral!
You can just come up with a race that is against both good and evil. Its main goal is to conquer land, as a result, the forces of good and the forces of evil decide to unite!

Nonsense! It turns out not a full-scale war between Good and Evil, but a sandbox battle. The kids were playing, and then - bam, strangers arrived and all the representatives of the kindergarten united in a sacred struggle against a common enemy. I'm not against a neutral race, but the unification of everyone against this race is illogical. Imagine: Nazi Germany united with the USSR against neutral Switzerland. Others should fight against the neutrals, but not in an alliance.

Added 10 minutes ago

Correct! You can even come up with an interesting campaign for this story, about the struggle of irreconcilable enemies with a universal enemy, and in the end, evil would give strength to good and remain the only race on earth!

Question: are there more UNIVERSAL enemies than the warriors of Hell, who already belong to the cohort of IRRECONCILABLE enemies?

Added 8 minutes ago

Only in alliance with evil (if you are good) or vice versa. In scenarios, then let 2 races (let's say humans and Necropolis) fight against the invaders! Without an alliance, it is impossible.

I'm right, for some, Heroes is a sandbox battle. Necropolis is the race of invaders. Why invent invaders for the invaders? A neutral race is good, but in the concept of pacifists, anarchists, "I don't care" (underline as needed), but not as a force that would make the hordes of Evil selflessly defend the lands that they themselves were going to conquer.

Added 11 minutes ago

The point is that this should be a single race, and not just separate units from different races. And Alkonost is a bird with a woman's face, capable of predicting the future. Let's have feminism!

Not feminism, but emancipation.