Auto-translated
Reply to my post with a hot seat game....
Depending on the circumstances of your reply, I might give it some thought....
Depending on the circumstances of your reply, I might give it some thought....
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Armageddon's Blade is a beast of an artifact; it's better to play without it, it will be more interesting.
...and the question arose - why did they make it like this? What was the point of creating such a crazy art style?
It's decent art, actually. If you understand how it works, you can use it effectively... It's just that it wasn't fully programmed, it's a bit buggy, but there's nothing you can do about it now. Let's consider these bugs as features... :)
So, a question arose - if the opponent has the Armageddon's Blade, how does it work as protection against another Armageddon's Blade? I haven't encountered this situation before.
If this spell is cast by the artifact's wielder, it affects all units on the battlefield. If it's cast by an opponent, it affects all enemy units and only those of their own troops that would be affected even without the Sphere.
The catch is that he could cast Armageddon with the exact same disastrous result for himself! :D That's why I clarified the point... And you're right about everything else... :D