Auto-translated
In my opinion, Berserkers are the most useless. They run around on their own, and you can't control them. Although, they can sometimes turn the tide of battle.
Rionus
Posts from The most USELESS monster.
Auto-translated
Leprechauns, peasants, and squires immediately come to mind.
R@zer
Auto-translated
well, here there are probably peasants... and also leprechauns.
DEMO16
Auto-translated
In my opinion, Peasants are the best, as they provide income that is needed at the beginning of the game, and later on, they don't bring in much money.
Next, Leprechauns give a small amount of gold, have low luck, and deal minimal damage.
On water, Pirates are effective, but on land, they are completely useless.
Пандора
Auto-translated
In my opinion, peasants are the best, but they provide income, which is needed at the very beginning of the game, and at the end, they don't bring in much money.
Next, Leprechauns give a small amount of gold, luck, and minimal damage.
Pirates are effective on water, but they are completely useless on land.
Well, at the very beginning, the income from peasants (as well as their usefulness) is not very high. Just one gold... it doesn't add up to much. And at that time, all the money goes to the necessary units and buildings. But later in the game, yes. Once I had almost 1,500 of these taxpayers. The map was very rich in their buildings, so they accumulated.
Budda
Auto-translated
Leprechauns aren't useless; they distract the enemy, and tens of thousands of peasants attack. And that's how you win!
DEMO16
Auto-translated
But no one hoards them; if a unit slot is free, they take them as cannon fodder, and in the end, there's a lot of money left over, and peasants are no longer needed with their 1-1 damage.
IronAxe
Auto-translated
Leprechauns aren't useless; they distract the enemy, and tens of thousands of peasants attack. And that's how you win!
StormS-K
Auto-translated
Berserkers may be dumb, but they can manage to hack down a certain number of enemies if fighting neutrals. But if they're fighting humans, you need a lot of them to survive and reach the enemy...
Starhan
Auto-translated
what do you want, the first level... especially against humans (not even mentioning Berserkers)
with what level hero will you defend against archers and mages? with a level 4 hero? wow
squires (if you have them) can withstand 2 hits well, and with magic, even all 4 hits from the enemy. :)
Added after 3 minutes
in my opinion, the most useless monster is the one...
...let me be original...
that doesn't make it to the enemy army before the final battle.
with what level hero will you defend against archers and mages? with a level 4 hero? wow
squires (if you have them) can withstand 2 hits well, and with magic, even all 4 hits from the enemy. :)
Added after 3 minutes
in my opinion, the most useless monster is the one...
...let me be original...
that doesn't make it to the enemy army before the final battle.
DEMO16
Auto-translated
U]
Added 3 minutes later
[/U]in my opinion, the most useless monster is the one that...
...let me be original...
...doesn't make it to the enemy army before the final battle.
Lu41k
Auto-translated
Why are leprechauns considered useless right away? I agree, they move incredibly slowly, but they can cast luck spells and can be used as a shield to absorb damage. However, there's one caveat: it makes no sense to include them in your army; if you use them, it should only be through summoning.
Пандора
Auto-translated
I stand by my opinion... There are no USELESS monsters. Even if it's just meat, it's still useful.
General ZeT
Auto-translated
I agree, there aren't any completely useless creatures; even meat is useful as a distraction. But sometimes there are situations where a creature provides minimal benefit, but it's still there. Although – a leprechaun is useless against a Dragon King, isn't it? – Here's one situation where a leprechaun is useless. Here's another – a djinn is very useful, but in a battle against a Black Dragon and a Minotaur, its usefulness drops to a minimum.
Пандора
Auto-translated
No, General ZeT, I don't think so. My initial opinion about him being a bad tactician hasn't changed. This doesn't mean I don't respect your opinion. But I can't accept it, not even fully understand it.
After all, all these examples are taken out of context, from the game. I just can't imagine a battle between a Djinn and a Black Dragon, a Leprechaun and a Colossus. It's unlikely that such a battle is even possible. I consider the entire game as a whole, the entire strategy. And if you (or I) happen to have useless units in a particular battle, then you (or I) are to blame. In any case, it is always known who you will be fighting, whether it's neutral creatures guarding something or an opponent.
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb