Skip to content

Knights of Tezoth

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to AstralLein
User Avatar
#6835
Auto-translated
AstralLein

How badly Plague and Blight want to take the northerners under their control)

Fear has big eyes. And some fears have very big eyes...:smile04:🤣

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#6836
Auto-translated

And is Lady Ninahisama really sure that killing a horse = killing the enemy and restoring your turn? The horse has no turn order, no position on the battlefield, it's just an item in the character's inventory, and the character is alive... of course, from the standpoint of mount counterplay it's not bad, but at the same time it's not particularly logical...

Карты для героев 5

"Плата за любовь"
"Путь некроманта"
"Темные грани"
"Рок Гримхейма"
In reply to Нэйко
User Avatar
#6837
Auto-translated
Neiko
kcfgogbfalgfl

Neira, remind me what the current situation is with your character's father — is he still on active Knight service?

For now, yes. Iron Knight Roderick Valentine is considering retirement and helping Adalard in a civilian position, but he hasn't stepped down yet.

He'd better hurry up and make a decision before the prologue ends, or I'll have to ask you to write him a battle charm 😅

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС - Турнир -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

User Avatar
#6839
Auto-translated

It's not laziness, but a difference in approaches, Astral. Reven usually leaves characters from the questline, their roleplay, and similar elements to the players' discretion. Putting together another knight is a quick job, generally speaking. But there's no guarantee that the knight you assemble will match the image the player has in mind.

In reply to AstralLein
User Avatar
#6840
Auto-translated
AstralLein

And is Lady Ninahisama really sure that killing a horse = killing the opponent and restoring your turn? The horse has no turn order, no position on the battlefield, it's just an item in the character's inventory, and the character is alive... of course, from the standpoint of mount countering it's not bad, but it's not particularly logical...

I am sure. When Lester killed Alsira's pegasus at the tournament, he also got a 2nd turn. Reven confirmed it then.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Злобный Ящур
User Avatar
#6841
Auto-translated
Wrathful Wyrm
Ple-Sen

Hmm, so Ambrose will be able to ram the dragoness on his turn, since a flyer needs a range equal to or greater than its weapon to attack?

Judging by Reven's answer, yes.

Could you clarify please, I didn't get it. Axel with a sword couldn't be attacked on that principle, for example?


Whatever
User Avatar
#6843
Auto-translated

So I understand that with dual weapons everything works as you described. Axel descends and strikes with the sword? He can be hit until he decides to switch to the bow on the next turn. Otherwise, it would create an absurd situation where even flyers lacking the bow skill would equip it just to gain a sort of invulnerability.

In reply to Heroist
User Avatar
#6844
Auto-translated
Heroist
Злобный Ящур
Ple-Sen

Hmm, so Ambrose will be able to ram the dragoness on his turn, since for a flyer's attack the range needs to be equal to or greater than its weapon?

Judging by Revan's answer, yes.

Could you please clarify, I didn't get it. Wouldn't Axel with a sword be unable to be attacked by that same principle, for example?

Well, Revan said that if the range is not lower, then a ground unit can reach. But if there are two weapons with different ranges, then the action decides.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#6845
Auto-translated

So the dragon lady should have taken a bow to at least maneuver safely until transitioning to melee.


Whatever
User Avatar
#6846
Auto-translated

Then they wouldn't have been able to get the imba shield.

User Avatar
#6847
Auto-translated

"– What a pity... and we were among the few on the battlefield who respected the Knights of Albus's striving for unity!" – Rezara remarked grimly, as the maiden from the order of something-or-other single-handedly stripped Swordgard of any chance of victory. – Gingkink, once we return to the Motherland, we'll take up running. It certainly won't hurt us!"

Lorikan, however, realizing the futility of his chances to strike down the one who had wronged his comrades, rushed 8 up.

Карты для героев 5

"Плата за любовь"
"Путь некроманта"
"Темные грани"
"Рок Гримхейма"
User Avatar
#6848
Auto-translated

Lorican moves.

Orvald's turn.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#6849
Auto-translated
Ple-Sen

I understand that with dual weapons everything works as you described. Axel descends and strikes with a sword? He can be hit until he decides to switch to a bow on the next turn. Otherwise, it would create an absurd situation where even flyers without the bow skill would equip it just to gain such invulnerability.

Yes, that's right.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС - Турнир -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария