Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Alright, whatever, without a crit against that scum with a weapon that essentially gives infinite action points from the start, there was no chance. Overall, out of all of them, I have one of the crappiest weapons. Well, maybe Candle's is also junk, only useful for letting players on mounts pass in the tournament.
Have you seen my sword? In the context of duels, it differs from a regular sword only by slightly higher damage.
Your bow gives you an improved version of my paralyzing strike: 80 extra damage that always hits and can potentially jump to another target. 2 action points would give you a guaranteed victory against someone like Alsira, without needing to rely on RNG.
I'll agree it's worse than Candle's and Chonchonlia's weapons, but I definitely can't call it useless.
Orvald has paralysis without spending action points. Axel has an accuracy bonus and darkness from his sword (though the bow is crap, fact). Emilia's bow practically gives my Gildarian skill, albeit a worse version. Ambrose's spear ignores defense. Lester not only has the right to 3 attacks at once, but also a passive stun, plus a decent crit bonus. Alsira's spear causes a nasty curse on crit. Your sword is useful in fights with more than 1 opponent + throwing knives, allowing you to attack from range.
If we don't count Emilia, everyone's bonuses are passive without spending action points. I, for example, have only 4 action points, and 1 will normally go to the Gildarian skill. So outside of tournament conditions, I can only make up to 3 powerful shots, and that's it, then just weak pokes.
Alright, whatever, without a crit against that scum with a weapon that essentially gives infinite AP from the start, there was no chance. Overall, out of all of them, I have one of the crappiest weapons. Well, maybe Candle's is also junk, only useful for letting players on mounts pass in the tournament.
Have you seen my sword? In the context of duels, it differs from a regular sword only by slightly higher damage.
Your bow gives you an improved version of my paralyzing strike: 80 extra damage that always hits and can potentially jump to another target. 2 AP would give you a guaranteed victory against someone like Alsira, without relying on RNG.
I'll agree it's worse than Candle's and Chonchonlia's weapons, but I definitely can't call it useless.
Orwald has paralysis without spending AP. Axel has a bonus to accuracy and darkness from his sword (though the bow is crap, fact). Emilia's bow practically gives me my Guildaria skill, albeit a worse version. Ambrose's spear ignores defense. Lester not only has the right to 3 attacks at once, but also a passive stun, plus a decent crit bonus. Alsira's spear causes a decay debuff on crit. Your sword is useful in fights with more than 1 opponent + throwing knives, allowing you to hit from range.
If we don't count Emilia, everyone's bonuses are passive without spending AP. I, for example, have only 4 AP, and 1 will naturally go to the Guildaria skill. So outside of tournament conditions, I can only make up to 3 powerful shots, and then it's just weak pokes.
I wasn't arguing that those guys' weapons are better than yours. But your bow also gives an advantage unavailable to other characters, even if it's worse on average due to AP limitations.
As for my sword, we'll test it. For now, I suspect its base damage is too low for the ability to work consistently. I can imagine situations where it could shine, but for now the passive seems more situational. At least until I get some damage bonuses.
The knives worked well, I'll agree there. Didn't expect it myself.
Neiko
AstralLein
I wonder if my sword's bleed effect would even be useful... bleed can be considered as armor ignore, but it kills too slowly.
You have a strong sword, dunno why you didn't go to the tournament for reputation.
Heroist
The weakest weapon is actually mine, but luckily it was only needed in two battles
Now everyone will come running and say: "no, the crappiest weapon is mine!"
Except Lester, because he's too much of a gigachad for such whining.
I forgot about something in the battles of Candle 5 and 6 of the tour. Well, let everything stay as it is now, it's too late to change anything... Sorry. I'll prepare thoroughly for the bugurt. Let it drag on longer than I'd like, but without any screw-ups...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Loku got lucky that I didn't know all the nuances in the first battle yet..
Otherwise, a lot depends on leveling. Experience has proven that having a lot of AP is great. And Will was often useful too, plus it stacked with the Hammers' trait, which is probably logical. If the stats were different, it would have been worse. I'd also like to max out Accuracy..
Yashchur, at the start of the tournament: Kinda dull with the participants in the tournament. You can call me a weirdo, but I like calculating battles.
Nebok, however, was still not thrilled with his Mrak sword.
I probably wouldn't complain so much if it weren't for the real unfair difference between weapon features. An NPC literally gets free AP, on top of also having the right to two turns. Meanwhile, a Heroist who spent a skill slot on this has to run around the map or absorb damage just to restore 1 AP.
Ple-Sen
AstralLein
