Expedition: general discussions. Auto-translated

I'm exhausted from coming up with names for the cities

Just call them city 1, city 2, city 3...

By the time I write the next set, we'll all be 50 years old. 

Well, happy anniversary to everyone, I guess...🤣🤣🤣

You're joking, but by age 50, you're already much closer to the crypt than to 0.

I know this is necro-posting. But I still can't help but speak my mind here.

No way. The author of the meme is either a tourist or a teenager playing homebrew. Creating a character like the one in the second picture in the fifth edition is impossible. You cannot be a half-angel. Some half-elf Aasimar with a dragon great-grandfather might be possible in theory, but in practice, I've never seen even something similar. Firearms are available only in certain settings, where no one is surprised by them. An Artificer is usually in the same situation as firearms. In fact, an Artificer with such a weapon is normal for the class. A dragon cannot be a pet according to the rules. A Wizard or Sorcerer of level 9+ can summon a dragon spirit, but this happiness will last only one hour. If the GM allows it, a spellcaster can take a pseudodragon as a familiar, but that's a classic familiar from old editions. A certain Ranger subclass may have a drake as a pet, which are the kobold equivalent of a dog. Paladins, again with GM permission, can take a dragonnel as a mount (again, far from a full-fledged dragon) at level 13+. You can make a ridiculous multiclass for yourself — there's no dispute there. But such an option has existed since the third edition, where there are far more opportunities for this. In five, if we're talking about ridiculous archetypes, what's common is not something shown in the pic, but Paladin-Warlock builds where everything goes through Charisma. And the result is not a desire to show off, but banal min-maxing.

In three, there are more options. You have various types of dragon familiars and a general feat for a dragon follower. There's just about everything. Even the half-angel template is available there. I don't remember regarding firearms, but otherwise, you can assemble the miracle from the picture. I can't say, however, that I encountered such things often. Moreover, GMs can easily reject such a concept, which usually happens. Both here and in five. But human fighters, I see those consistently. Sometimes even in the mirror, through the eyes of a character.

As for characters like the second one in the picture, I've only encountered them about twenty years ago, in games played and run by teenagers. Usually, not even DnD, but banal text-based RPGs.

And you say Nebok is a lifer; now this person is a true lifer 👆

But characters like the second one in the picture, I've only encountered maybe twenty years ago, in games played and run by teenagers. Usually not even DnD, but banal text-based games.

Description of HeroesWorld players playing Expe.

Not at all. The author of the meme is either a tourist or some teenager playing homebrew. Creating a character like the one in the second picture in the fifth edition is impossible. You cannot be a half-angel. Some half-elf Aasimar with a dragon great-grandfather might be possible in theory, but in practice, I've never even seen anything similar. Firearms are only available in certain settings where no one is surprised by them. An Artificer is usually in the same situation as firearms. In fact, an Artificer with such weapons is normal for the class. You cannot have a dragon as a pet according to the rules. A Wizard or Sorcerer of level 9+ can summon a dragon spirit, but this happiness will only last for one hour. If the GM allows it, a spellcaster can take a pseudodragon as a familiar, but that's a classic familiar from old editions. A certain Ranger class may have a drake as a pet, which is the kobold equivalent of a dog. Paladins, again with GM permission, can take a dragonnel (once more, far from a full-fledged dragon) as a mount at level 13+. You can make a ridiculous multiclass for yourself — there's no arguing that. But such an option has existed since the third edition, where there are far more opportunities for it. In own five, if we're talking about ridiculous archetypes, what's common is not something shown in the pic, but Paladin-Warlocks, whose everything goes through Charisma. And the result is not a desire to show off, but banal min-maxing.

I understood half of this at best.

A description of HeroesWorld players playing Exp.

That's exactly what Ples was saying about HeroesWorld players.

And you say Nebok is a lifer; now that's a true lifer 👆

But Ples is simply playing D&D, not messing around with alt-girls all night long.

I've been playing DnD with alt-girls all night long. (not)

Too late, I've been exposed.

I've had my fill of playing with my alt-girls in DnD and have come back to tease the no-lifers...

Did we write quests for the first expedition in Haven? I stumbled upon them by chance and was surprised. I need to save mine for the collection.

Who's going to keep an eye on Nebos now, he's totally going to jump ship.

Who’s going to control Nebos now, he’s totally losing it.

😠

A bout of prolonged depression will control me.

When you can't decide between a hydra and a horse..

hmm. maybe breed a new kind of horse using magic? call it Hydrorse or Dragorse 🤔

It's obviously Dragorse. You were so close, Arets. I'm disappointed