Expedition: general discussions.

Auto-translated

Author

Not at all. The author of the meme is either a tourist or some teenager playing homebrew. Creating a character like the one in the second picture in the fifth edition is impossible. You cannot be a half-angel. Some half-elf Aasimar with a dragon great-grandfather might be possible in theory, but in practice, I've never even seen anything similar. Firearms are only available in certain settings where no one is surprised by them. An Artificer is usually in the same situation as firearms. In fact, an Artificer with such weapons is normal for the class. You cannot have a dragon as a pet according to the rules. A Wizard or Sorcerer of level 9+ can summon a dragon spirit, but this happiness will only last for one hour. If the GM allows it, a spellcaster can take a pseudodragon as a familiar, but that's a classic familiar from old editions. A certain Ranger class may have a drake as a pet, which is the kobold equivalent of a dog. Paladins, again with GM permission, can take a dragonnel (once more, far from a full-fledged dragon) as a mount at level 13+. You can make a ridiculous multiclass for yourself — there's no arguing that. But such an option has existed since the third edition, where there are far more opportunities for it. In own five, if we're talking about ridiculous archetypes, what's common is not something shown in the pic, but Paladin-Warlocks, whose everything goes through Charisma. And the result is not a desire to show off, but banal min-maxing.I understood half of this at best.
Author
A description of HeroesWorld players playing Exp.
That's exactly what Ples was saying about HeroesWorld players.

Графомания путешественника

Reading content in

Interface language

Expedition: general discussions.