Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
No, I think I'm just being negative... guys, don't execute me, just pour orange juice on me(((
If you only read the literary descriptions of all three female roles, where did the reasoning about Inar's usefulness come from before the clue appeared against you?
Okay, let's consider all the factors.
There are no blocks, checks, or other displayed NDs against you, which aligns well with Inar's isolation.
The clue is normal, in my opinion. It's moderately difficult and long.
What about your daytime behavior? Well, you said it all yourself.
You could theoretically be Town or Mafia, but the combination of factors is against you. If you weren't Mafia, you would be pushing for Medja right now.
I thought for a long time between you and Morning, I like both clues in themselves. But even when I started guessing the clue, I said that starting from Perina was nonsense, but I didn't see any other options. After the clue from Nebo, I realized that maybe it really wasn't necessary to start from Perina. Also, Morning didn't want to vote for Mafia. That's why my vote is like that.
So, now the question is: what exactly is the misunderstanding? Are you saying that all this time, you were executing me as Necoran, not Inar, because of yesterday? Based on the fact that I said something in favor of Medj? Despite the fact that your posts about my execution don't mention Necoran at all? After you admitted that you accepted the interpretation of the clue against me as a clue against Inar? After your post #681?
but I was celebrating a friend's birthday that day
Your defense of Medja regarding the evidence doesn't tell me anything; it could have just been a way to curry favor with him, nothing more.
Hey, wouldn't you want to record Yaschur's voice so we can find some double-voice actors?
In other words, as a Mage and having committed a murder with evidence, I would try to exonerate a random player who would be executed based on that evidence. I wouldn't remain silent and abstain from voting for the execution, nor would I casually add my vote without causing a fuss, because as a Mage, it would be beneficial for me if the townsfolk executed the rest. Instead, I would actively defend a suspicious player during the day, a player who is already being targeted, and to whom my evidence has been attributed, putting myself in the spotlight. Hoping to win... nothing. To curry favor with the suspicious player during the day. This doesn't seem logical to me, and you haven't justified it, but nevertheless, you used it as one of the arguments in several of your posts yesterday. Shouldn't I consider this a blatant attempt to frame me? I should.
That's basically it. As you can see, I'm not urging anyone to vote against you, but I'm sharing my thoughts on why you're not on the list of people I can trust.
Master, wouldn't you want to remove your vote from Yashur so we can look for double-voters?
Well, why not? I understand if 10 people suddenly voted for him after me, and you would defend him. But in this case, it was clear that he wouldn't be executed, so why not "defend" him?