Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Your defense of Medja regarding the evidence doesn't tell me anything; it could have just been a way to curry favor with him, nothing more.
So, as a mage who committed a murder with evidence, I would be defending a random player who would be executed based on that evidence. I wouldn't remain silent and abstain from the execution, nor would I simply add my vote without causing a fuss, because it would be beneficial for me as a mage if the towns executed the others. Instead, I would actively defend a suspicious player during the day, a player who is already being targeted, and to whom my evidence has been attributed, putting myself in the spotlight. Hoping to win... nothing. Just to curry favor with the suspicious player during the day. This doesn't seem logical, and you haven't justified it, but nevertheless, you used it as one of the arguments in several of your posts yesterday. Shouldn't I consider this a blatant attempt to frame me? I should. That's all. As you can see, I'm not urging anyone to vote against you, but I'm sharing my thoughts on why you're not on the list of people I can trust.