change the number of posts required to change level. — Suggestions and improvements.

Statistics

Registered: 3/3/2007 2:58 PM UTC

Posts: 261

10/16/2007 4:37 AM UTC #16

Auto-translated

Strongly disagree.
Because it's very difficult to gain a good player rating with posts here if you don't engage in pointless chatter... because everything worthwhile and interesting has already been said here by other people...

(damn, and I really wanted to "earn" my way up to the Cerberus rank...)

Restless. Endless. Mindless.
[/center]

З.Ы: кадилом по голове не бить.

З.З.Ы: А вот у нас в Шио....:D

In reply to Слоныш

Statistics

Registered: 9/27/2007 10:02 AM UTC

Posts: 596

10/16/2007 6:15 AM UTC #17

Auto-translated

Slonysh;119197

What mistake, Zet? What are you even talking about? The rules have changed, and you're still talking about your rank. :mad:
Previously, ranks were assigned differently, but now the Rules have been updated. Just when I reached level 7 (500+ posts), I was demoted back to level 6 because the Rules now state that level 7 is achieved with 750+ posts.
This whole mess is starting to get annoying: of course, ranks are just a trivial thing and a game, but if you consider it a minor issue, then let's just abandon the rank system altogether! If it was introduced for the interest and entertainment of users, then what's the point of this constant "devaluation" of ranks?:mad:

There was an error. And to fix it, it was necessary to change the rank system. Because, if it weren't for me, these changes might not have happened. I found the error and told Hacker. As one of the administrators, he couldn't leave the error in the forum. And he probably found a way to fix it in this way. There's nothing wrong with that. Or am I wrong?

:smile17:

In reply to General ZeT

Statistics

Registered: 11/17/2006 10:47 AM UTC

Posts: 1,775

10/16/2007 7:54 AM UTC #18

Auto-translated

General ZeT;119268

There was a mistake. And to fix it, it was necessary to change the ranking system. Because, if it weren't for me, these changes might not have happened. I found the error and told Hacker. As one of the administrators, he couldn't leave the error in the forum. And he probably found a way to fix it in this way. There's nothing terrible about it. Or am I wrong?

First of all, reducing the ranks of all other forum members because of one person's rank is, excuse me, absurd. I still hope that this didn't actually happen. It's like breaking a cabinet to get an extra nail and hang a picture on the wall. :smile04:
It would have been better to leave the person with the "incorrect" rank.
Secondly, I really want to finally hear comments from the administration. It's nice, of course, that we're all racking our brains and making assumptions here, but essentially, we're all just reading tea leaves, and the administration is silent. There's also silence in the thread about the changes on the forum.
People should know the truth!:smile15: Everyone to the barricades!:smile15: Give me back my mage!:smile15:

Statistics

Registered: 9/27/2007 10:02 AM UTC

Posts: 596

10/16/2007 8:06 AM UTC #19

Auto-translated

Maybe the error wasn't just with me, but with many others. It's just that no one noticed it. Have you checked your profile in the user section?

:smile17:

In reply to General ZeT

Statistics

Registered: 11/17/2006 10:47 AM UTC

Posts: 1,775

10/16/2007 8:27 AM UTC #20

Auto-translated

General ZeT;119291

Maybe the error wasn't just with me, but with many others. It's just that no one noticed it. Have you checked your profile in the user section?

Personally, yes. I checked it periodically and even changed something in it. So what?
Based on my rank and the number of posts, I was sure that 500+ meant level 7, which for Tower corresponds to a mage.:smile06:
And in general, ZeT, let's wait for a clear (or at least some) answer from the administration, okay? Were you authorized to answer for someone else's actions? Whoever did it should explain to the users why and for what reason. We've been guessing for two days now.

In reply to AmberSoler

Statistics

Registered: 9/5/2007 5:50 PM UTC

Posts: 25

10/16/2007 8:35 AM UTC #21

Auto-translated

2 Tony Montana I apologize for using your post as an example; it's nothing personal – it's just very relevant to the topic you brought up here... ;)[/QUOTE]
I don't have anything better to do than write 499 messages??? I was just joking about that, and I don't actually write much... mostly I read and take things into consideration... :smile10: ;)

Statistics

Registered: 9/2/2006 9:10 AM UTC

Posts: 1,700

10/16/2007 8:49 AM UTC #22

Auto-translated

And they nerfed my Pegasus! It's a total nightmare, awful. But honestly, I don't care! What's the difference? Can someone explain it to me, because I'm completely clueless - I DON'T UNDERSTAND!

Индивидуальный и клановый рейтинги Heroes World
Handmade

In reply to Kamikaze

Statistics

Registered: 11/17/2006 10:47 AM UTC

Posts: 1,775

10/16/2007 8:54 AM UTC #23

Auto-translated

Kamikaze;119303

Honestly, I don't care! What's the difference? Can someone explain it to me, because I really don't understand!

Kamikaze, if there is no difference, then why introduce ranks at all? Personally, I'm not chasing ranks; otherwise, I would be posting 10 times in threads like "Which unit of level n is better?" and would already be a genie or a nude.:smile06: But if ranks have already been introduced, then why constantly raise the bar? Explain it to me... I'm as dense as wood.:confused:
In the end, the administration should have a reason for every action, and an answer like, "Oh, just forget about these ranks" is not an explanation.

Statistics

Registered: 7/29/2006 7:41 PM UTC

Posts: 1,299

10/16/2007 8:56 AM UTC #24

Auto-translated

I really don't understand why people are so worried. What is a rank, anyway? Just ask yourself that question: what will you achieve with it? Respect? No, then why discuss it so persistently, especially since everyone knows that no changes will happen. There is a system of morality for earning respect, but this is just for smiles and that's all...

Inflation never goes in reverse!

I think my position is clear.

Sincerely.

"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."

Statistics

Registered: 3/5/2007 8:31 AM UTC

Posts: 23,676

10/16/2007 9:00 AM UTC #25

Auto-translated

Yeah! I also had to change Pegasus and switch to a Druid. But at least he doesn't have that horned helmet!
Oh well... I was hoping to become a Titan or an Angel...
It's a shame, of course, but it's not a big deal. Maybe they'll change it back someday... who knows?

P.S. All this is about avatars and such. But it makes this forum different from others. And it's somehow more pleasant with them.

Be strong. Believe

In reply to Слоныш

Statistics

Registered: 9/2/2006 9:10 AM UTC

Posts: 1,700

10/16/2007 9:07 AM UTC #26

Auto-translated

Slohnish;119304

Kamikaze, if there is no difference, then why introduce ranks at all? Personally, I don't chase ranks, otherwise I would post 10 times in topics like "Which unit of level n is better?" and would already be a genie or a nude.:smile06: But if ranks have already been introduced, then why constantly raise the bar? Explain it to me...like I'm made of wood.:confused:

Where is it written about these ranks and the bars? I never thought about it. Maybe something interesting. Can you give me a link? ;)

Индивидуальный и клановый рейтинги Heroes World
Handmade

In reply to Kamikaze

Statistics

Registered: 7/29/2006 7:41 PM UTC

Posts: 1,299

10/16/2007 9:21 AM UTC #27

Auto-translated

Kamikaze;119308

Where is it written about these ranks and the tiers? I never thought about it. Maybe it's something interesting. Can you provide a link? ;)

Here's the link, you'll see everything there:)

http://www.forum.heroesworld.ru/faq.php?faq=hw_help_system#faq_hw_help_system_rang

"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."

In reply to Kamikaze

Statistics

Registered: 9/27/2007 10:02 AM UTC

Posts: 596

10/16/2007 9:26 AM UTC #28

Auto-translated

Kamikaze;119308

Where is it written about these ranks and tiers? I never thought about it. Maybe it's something interesting. Can you provide a link? ;)

On the top panel buttons of the forum window, there is a "Help" button. Click on it and then select "Rank Ladder".

:smile17:

In reply to Kamikaze

Statistics

Registered: 11/17/2006 10:47 AM UTC

Posts: 1,775

10/16/2007 9:40 AM UTC #29

Auto-translated

Kamikaze;119308

Where is it written about these ranks and the tiers? I never thought about it. Maybe it's something interesting. Can you provide a link? ;)

Here is the link.

To those who persistently argue that ranks are not necessary, I want to say: yes, ranks are not necessary, and the morale system is also not necessary, and the chat is also not necessary. In life, there are many things that are not necessary, but pleasant. By the way, playing Heroes is also not necessary...
Ranks exist only for entertainment, but since they exist, constantly devaluing them is quite strange.

In reply to Слоныш

Statistics

Registered: 5/23/2006 10:03 AM UTC

Posts: 2,071

10/16/2007 9:46 AM UTC #30

Auto-translated

I stumbled upon this topic by chance... mainly thanks to **Ley**. Well, you've certainly filled it with a lot of chatter... :D

Slonysh;119315

Ranks exist only for entertainment, but since they do exist, constantly devaluing them is quite strange.

By the way, I'll note that they haven't devalued; on the contrary, they've increased in value :D because to achieve the same mage rank, you have to "pay" with a much larger number of posts... and the significance of a post, in this interpretation, has actually devalued.

Кто состоянием своим доволен, тому жить весело. (с)Алекса́ндр Васи́льевич Суво́ров