Posts from Favorites, into battle! - 11.

If you're going to include a restructuring of the library, then do it for everyone.

those who respect each other's time.
To put it more simply, even in the group stage, I would like opponents who will play with OH.

Tournaments on HotA are mandatory, on SoD - optional. And SoD will die out soon anyway, so it's a great idea not to introduce HotA into SoD tournaments. The SoD players will destroy themselves:smile54:

Alfein, you thought yourself to be smart, yet you don't understand such simple things; again, you didn't even read my text properly, there isn't a single word saying that OX urgently needs to be introduced into all stages of SoD tournaments (as of now, it's not anywhere at all).

What needs to be changed in these rules, and to what?

9. In the group stage and early stages of the playoffs, play without simultaneous turns.

Dude, I'm all for a complete ban on "sod-serious" tournaments.
However, it's so funny to read about the aforementioned people who, at every opportunity, bring up the "Sorcerer." Seriously, it's like in school, someone said something that doesn't align with the general notions of the masses, and they start bullying him, and it's not just once, they constantly try to make it a recurring theme (it would be okay if they could do it well).
And now, what we're seeing is already a clinical case for them (presumably due to a lack of self-affirmation in real life).

I wonder, if the "Sorcerer" continues to stick to his line, will the underachievers also continue to exert their "intellect"?

What exactly is the logic?
It makes sense to include the "Restructuring" ability in games where one player plays as a "Tower" – and this would be an additional advantage for the "Tower."
Against the backdrop of "Conflict," "Necropolis," "Dungeon," and "Archangel," strengthening any of the clearly lagging cities is a good idea.
I would like to strengthen "Inferno," "Barbarian," and "Swamp" as well, but we don't know how. And here there is an opportunity, so why not use it.

And what is the logic of always including it? I, however, don't know what the logic is behind why the "Restructuring" ability for the "Library" was decided to be disabled. :D
If anyone knows, please write.

Regarding the "OH" (Overlord Heroes) – this is my response to Kaliban and Hell – I want to say the following.
The pinnacle of esports on this Portal is the Final Battle and the selection for it – OFB (Overlord Final Battle).

So why wasn't there a test run of "OH" on the "Polygon"? Moreover, your words only confirm mine – it should have been tested on the "Polygon."

Perhaps it would be worth adding that, by agreement between the players, they can play with the "One Hero" rule?

All the rules listed apply by default.
By mutual agreement, participants can make any changes to them, except for the town they play as (point 1) and the game version (point 2).
If possible, indicate your agreements in the game report so that it is possible to analyze this information.

Regarding OH — this is my answer to Caliban and Hell — I want to say the following.
The pinnacle of esports on this Portal is Final Battle and the Qualification for it — OFB.

If our OFB-12 Qualification took place COMPLETELY WITHOUT OH.
Aren't you asking for too much to introduce OH at all stages in what is, by design, the most massive, fun, and casual-player-friendly tournament on the Portal?
Do you really not see any contradiction here?


Honestly, I had considered the idea that it might be possible to separate people in isolated cases and by different groups. But I haven't had time to think it through yet. And in the case of OH / without OH, you'd have to separate groups of 20 people, which could become a serious headache. It's hard to even assess the technology and labor costs involved.
But I want to ask you a different question — imagine that in your group there are 3 people who agree to play with OH, and 2 who don't. And up to the 1/4 finals, you run into another person without OH.
Would that cause you enough moral anguish not to play at all?