Skip to content

Posts from OFB-12

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Announcement
User Avatar
8 years ago
Auto-translated
«OFB - 12»


Registration is open for the qualifying tournament for the most prestigious online HoMM 3 tournament on heroesworld.ru – «Final Battle»

Organizational Matters:

1. Tournament host – Sanin (ICQ - 423164784); judges – LuckyF (ICQ - 681350680), Dave_HUN (ICQ - 635192642), Dirty Player (ICQ - 408722873).
2. The tournament is official, regular, and conducted according to the Rules for organizing, conducting, and participating in online HOMM3 tournaments.
3. All tournament games are included in the HoMM3 HW Player Rating.
4. After the start of tournament games, the tournament regulations will not change.
5. Disputed matters, if any arise, are discussed outside the forum. To resolve, contact the host or one of the tournament judges on ICQ and provide daily save files, ICQ logs, and other necessary information.
6. Tournament games must be played within the established deadline. Violation of game deadlines may, at the discretion of the host and tournament judges, result in penalties up to and including disqualification from the tournament.

Requirements for Participants:

- Players with unconfirmed reports will not be accepted into the tournament.
- Applications from players recently registered on the forum will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
- The organizers reserve the right to refuse registration to players who have repeatedly withdrawn or been disqualified from other HeroesWorld tournaments.

Regulations

Rules:

1. Game Version: The tournament is played on the SoD version + HD mod.
2. Tournament games use the HW_rulez 1.40 and HW_rulez 1.38.2 patches.
HW_rulez 1.38.2 patch is used for playing on the h3dm1 template and for games in "Battle of Mages" mode.
HW_rulez 1.40 patch is used for all other templates and in all rounds except the second.
3. The tournament is conducted according to the rules of online HoMM 3 games.
Clarification to the rules: on all templates, the "Mage Guild Restructure" option must be enabled, while when playing with the HW_rulez 1.40 patch, the "Library Restructure" option is disabled. When playing with the HW_rulez 1.38.2 patch, there are no restrictions on Library Restructure.
4. Restarts total 3 days (111+111+111 or 111+112 or 113), for the h3dm1 template – one day (111).
5. Templates:
Panic, h3dm1, Diamond, Mini-Nostalgia, Jebus Cross, 6lm10a, Spider.
The template is chosen by standard drawing of lots, the order of the draw is determined by a coin toss.
6. The tournament game regulations will change depending on the round.
First Round: standard bidding, standard rules.
Second Round: standard bidding, games are played with the "Battle of Mages" option enabled (more about the option).
Third Round: standard bidding, standard rules.
Fourth Round: standard bidding, but opponents choose each other's starting heroes (see the 2010 tournament for an example).
Details. For all templates except h3dm1: after generating a pair of towns in the lobby, standard bidding takes place. The player who wins the bidding chooses their town first, after which opponents assign each other starting heroes.
For the h3dm1 template: a random town is generated in the lobby, after which opponents bid for the right to assign the opponent's hero first.
Fifth Round: standard bidding, standard rules.
Sixth Round: 200% fullrandom on all templates. Color is determined by a coin toss and changes after each subjective restart.
Seventh Round: standard bidding, standard rules.
Eighth Round: standard bidding, games are played without rules on all templates.
Ninth Round: standard bidding, standard rules.
7. Color selection: bidding is conducted for the right to choose color (exception - sixth round).

Tournament Format:

1. Registration from July 13 to July 21 (dates may be adjusted, follow updates).
2. Start of tournament games – July 23, 2018. End of tournament – November 26, 2018.
3. The tournament is conducted using the Swiss system in 9 rounds. Each round lasts 14 days.
4. Within the round deadline, a report of the completed round game must be submitted in the tournament thread to record the tournament result. Failure to comply with this rule requirement will result in either a technical result or a 0-0 score being assigned for the match.
5. Round deadlines:
Round 1: July 23 – August 5
Round 2: August 6 – August 19
Round 3: August 20 – September 2
Round 4: September 3 – September 16
Round 5: September 17 – September 30
Round 6: October 1 – October 14
Round 7: October 15 – October 28
Round 8: October 29 – November 11
Round 9: November 12 – November 25
6. A win gives 3 points, a draw gives 1 point, a loss gives 0 points.
Places are determined based on points earned.
In case of a tie in points, the following tiebreakers apply in order of priority:
1) Buchholz coefficient;
2) Number of wins;
3) Head-to-head result;
If the tiebreakers do not allow for the distribution of places among participants who may qualify for the final stage of the tournament, tie-breaks will be held.
Tie-break rules: drawing lots for templates, random pair of towns + bidding for town choice and color choice.
7. 16 players participate in the «Final Battle–12»:
FB-11 Winner LuckyF,
FB-11 2nd place Dave_HUN,
FB-11 3rd place FireToSky,
Winner or finalist of the «Only XL-5» tournament,
Winner or finalist of the «Favorites, Into Battle-10» tournament,
Winner or finalist of the «Wowa Memorial» tournament,
Winner of the «Новичок - 2018. Winter» tournament, provided they have a rating of 1750+,
The top 9 places (guaranteed) – from the OFB-12 tournament.

Additions:
If the winner of the «Новичок - 2018. Winter» tournament refuses to participate in FB-12, their slot will be taken by the finalist of that tournament;
If the winner (finalist) of the «Новичок - 2018. Winter» tournament does not have a rating of 1750+ at the start of the FB-12 tournament, their slot will be taken by the player who finished 10th or lower in OFB-12;
If LuckyF, Dave_HUN or FireToSky refuse to participate in FB-12, their slot will be taken by a player from the OFB-12 tournament;
If LuckyF, Dave_HUN or FireToSky win the «Only XL-5», «Favorites, Into Battle-10» or «Wowa Memorial» tournaments, the right to participate in FB-12 passes to the finalists of those tournaments.
If the winners of the «Only XL-5», «Favorites, Into Battle-10» or «Wowa Memorial» tournaments are among the players who take a qualifying place in OFB-12 or refuse to participate in the FB-12 tournament, the right to participate in FB-12 passes to the finalists of those tournaments.
If the finalists of the «Only XL-5», «Favorites, Into Battle-10» or «Wowa Memorial» tournaments are also among the players who take a qualifying place in OFB-12, or refuse to participate in the FB-12 tournament, their slot will be taken by the player who finished 10th or lower in OFB-12.
In reply to Лось
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
The eighth round is over. Technical results (the game was started): rebellious def Alin Technical results (the game was not started): Keba def MrP1nchy St_Klaus def Medium_HP Ihromant def graalzzz Browser def u2noob Mutual technical loss: RitoSux vs Vladimir_Ospa MadSpirit vs MinasMorgul The following players are eliminated from the tournament: graalzzz - by their own request u2noob - disqualified for two technical losses in a row MrP1nchy - by their own request RitoSux - disqualified for two technical losses in a row MadSpirit - disqualified for two technical losses in a row MinasMorgul - disqualified for two technical losses in a row
In reply to Sanin
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
The draw for the final round will take place on-site. The deadline for completing the games is November 30th. I am attaching the tournament standings before the last round.
Attachments 1
1 file attached • Total size: 32.2 KB
In reply to Sanin
7 years ago
Auto-translated
I understand that I have so few points because 3 of my opponents withdrew from the tournament. So, it seems that advancing to the final bracket still depends on whether your opponents withdraw or not. That's quite something.
In reply to Sanin
7 years ago
Auto-translated
a difficult endgame for both players; they decided not to prolong it and agreed to a draw.
Thank you for the game, and good luck in the future.
Battle Report Accepted
Подземелье / Dungeon Faction Подземелье / Dungeon
Шакти / Shakti Start Hero Шакти / Shakti
Шакти / Shakti Main Hero Шакти / Shakti
Ничья / Draw Ничья / Draw
Башня / Tower Faction Башня / Tower
Аин / Aine Start Hero Аин / Aine
Аин / Aine Main Hero Аин / Aine
Map Template
6lm10a
Game Length
111 days
Game Date
11/13/2018
Reported
11/13/2018 8:34 PM
Rating Impact Archived
Jelen117 1859 1861 +2 ↑
kamukag3e 1890 1890 ± 0
Rated Sep 28, 2022

Accepted by opponent on 11/13/2018 8:35 PM

In reply to Jelen117
7 years ago
Auto-translated
Jelen117
Both had a tough time, so we decided not to drag it out and agreed on a draw.
Thanks for the game, good luck in the future.
Thanks for the game!
In reply to Jelen117
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
Jelen117
11/13/2018 Jelen117 (Red, Dungeon, Shakti, Shakti) draw kamukag3e (Blue, Tower, Ain, Ain) 6lm10a 111

It was a tough match for both, so they decided not to drag it out and agreed to a draw.
Thanks for the game, good luck in the future.

We were both sweating during the 111th turn. I hope the organizers will take this into account in the rules for the next OFB. Last year, something similar was considered, and there was a ban on agreed-upon draws in the last two rounds.
In reply to sir Davos Seaworth
7 years ago
Auto-translated
sir Davos Seaworth
They were sweating buckets in round 111. I hope the organizers will take this into account when drafting the rules for the next OFB. Last year, a similar issue was addressed by prohibiting pre-arranged draws in the last two rounds.

But why do you think that in a qualifying tournament, this is somehow wrong? What's the point of prohibiting such actions? We scored enough points that we could agree to a draw in the last round; maybe our opponents should have won more?
If you're playing in a poker qualifying round and you have the biggest stack, no one will complain that you don't play with a pair of aces five times in a row, even if you're not knocking out those who have nothing left. Because what's the point?
And here, we might have to sweat for three weeks, trying to get into a situation that boils down to a draw, just for your amusement and to make things look good on the website?
In reply to Jelen117
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
It's not about my personal enjoyment, which is absent, but about a personal interest in the results. Simply put, such pre-arranged agreements automatically deprive other players, who have 15 points before the final round, of a chance to compete for a spot in the final tournament.
In reply to sir Davos Seaworth
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
1. I agree with Vinceras (even though he was my opponent in the last round). There should be a more flexible way to handle withdrawals, otherwise it becomes unfair. For example, half of Buchholz's score could be counted (as if they hadn't withdrawn, and all the remaining games were drawn) or something similar.

2. I agree with Jelen and Kamikaze. Banning agreed-upon draws is stupid. Players can always write a fake report and even, if necessary, provide fake saves (for example, by renaming the opponent in the saves folder). So, the honesty about a "difficult draw on move 111" looks better than that. And the claim that this draw "doesn't allow other players to compete for a spot" is complete nonsense. As Wojtek said, who prevented these players from scoring more points BEFORE the last round?
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
"Complete nonsense"? And now, should the top three pairs follow suit and also arrange for draws? And should Vintseras and Sanin surrender the victory to their opponents without a fight (they don't have any real chance of making it into the top ten anyway, according to Berger)? And that's it, the top 10 is known, the last round has no competitive meaning, it turns into a mere formality for everyone, not just for us "weaklings" who are just playing to finish the distance. I sincerely hope this doesn't happen. I'm not blaming Zhelena and Kamikaze; it's more of an oversight by the organizer, despite all due respect. Match-fixing is possible even with a ban on draws in the last two rounds, but in that case, the possibility would be much less. It's better to reduce such possibilities rather than encourage them.
In reply to sir Davos Seaworth
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
With that, esteemed Sir Davos, it’s hard to argue. But I’m just describing the harsh reality, not expressing an opinion. I personally don’t like Buchholz in this specific case, because he is very dependent on external factors (players participating, the draw for a large number of rounds, etc.). Perhaps it would be fairer to hold an additional round, like a playoff, among the players who scored 18 points (I understand this is a conditional passing score). Some short round with simple templates and 3-4 days to play.
In reply to =Lizard=
7 years ago
Auto-translated
Sanin will probably appear on the website and express his opinion. He seemed to prohibit such agreements, and in the last two rounds, only the judges can award draws after a month of play.
In reply to Dima Surmay
7 years ago
Auto-translated
Dima Surmay
Sanin will appear on the website and, I think, will express his opinion. He seemed to prohibit such agreements, and in the last two rounds, only the judges can award draws after a month of play.
What does "seemed to prohibit" mean if nothing about this is written on the first page in the tournament regulations? It only states that a win is 3 points, and a draw is 1.
In reply to LuckyF
User Avatar
7 years ago
Auto-translated
Agreed draws were prohibited in the previous offline tournament; I deliberately chose not to include this rule (if a detailed explanation is needed, I can provide it later this evening; I'm currently writing from my phone). Overall, I agree with Lizard.

Regarding Sir Davos's concerns, I don't think the others will do the same. Players with 21 points don't lose anything if they lose, so there's not much point in immediately aiming for a draw. Although HeroLvi might agree. And I can't speak for Vincerus, but I won't give up my match easily.

Also, 11th place will likely be a qualifying position. Sanya has a quota for another tournament, and the winner of the novice tournament is far from the required rating of 1750.
In reply to злой_романтик
7 years ago
Auto-translated
If it's allowed to declare draws without playing, then the last draw should be conducted using a different principle, so that there are no pairs where a draw would be sufficient for each participant to advance to the final bracket.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb