Posts from HW tournament statistics analyzer.

Hello, could you please tell me how to add such a banner to my page?

Thank you.

Previously, at a rating of 1600, there was a griffin; now, it's a champion. At 1800, there was a monarch; now, it's an archmage! Doesn't it seem that the rating gradation is no longer clear from the images?
Perhaps, we could revert to the old gradation but add intermediate units, since that's what you want.

Regarding the rating of old players, why ignore it? Just for the sake of having nice statistics on templates, castles, etc. (which can still exist with the old data, but won't be for all games, as I understand)? It sounds absurd and is disrespectful to them.

In general, if there are 2 standard creature lists, one for rating, like in scenarios, based on victory, and another list based on value. You can distribute the creatures proportionally from 1000 to 2500. I already suggested this idea to Nitro, but it never made it to implementation.

Up to 2500 would be great, but we've gotten used to 2k, and they're not growing anymore :D

Dear all, could you tell me how to add such a banner for myself?

Control Panel - Edit Signature -
[IMG]http://heroes3stat.appspot.com//banners/НИК.png[/IMG]

In one rating, I've played a total of 259 games, and in another, 383. Why is there such a difference? I still don't understand why I'm so bad at this:smile14:

In one rating, I've played 259 games, and in another, 383. Why is there such a difference? I still don't understand why I'm so bad:smile14:

Because, before the automatic reporting system, you had played 124 games. The HB rating takes this into account.

94. Diabler (58, 66, 124) 1600

Because, before the automatic reporting system, you had played 124 games. The ХВ rating takes this into account.

94. Diabler (58, 66, 124) 1600

Let's evenly distribute the creatures from 1000 to 2500.
I used the list that meo sent me + it was difficult to think clearly at night, so I probably (more precisely, 100%) made a mistake in the formula.

Castle
111 60
112 75
121 100
122 150
131 200
132 240
141 300
142 400
151 400
152 450
161 1000
162 1200
171 3000
172 5000
Rampart
211 70
212 90
221 120
222 150
231 200
232 225
241 250
242 275
251 350
252 425
261 850
262 950
271 2400
272 4000
Tower
311 30
312 40
321 130
322 160
331 150
332 200
341 350
342 450
351 550
352 600
361 1100
362 1600
371 2000
372 5000
Necropolis
411 60
412 70
421 100
422 125
431 200
432 230
441 360
442 500
451 550
452 600
461 1200
462 1500
471 1800
472 3000
Dungeon
511 50
512 65
521 130
522 170
531 250
532 280
541 300
542 330
551 500
552 575
561 850
562 1050
571 2500
572 4000
Inferno
611 50
612 60
621 125
622 175
631 200
632 250
641 250
642 270
651 500
652 700
661 900
662 1100
671 2700
672 4500
Stronghold
711 50
712 70
721 110
722 140
731 220
732 240
741 325
742 400
751 525
752 600
761 800
762 1100
771 2200
772 3500
Citadel
811 40
812 50
821 100
822 140
831 150
832 165
841 300
842 400
851 600
852 700
861 750
862 1100
871 1500
872 3000
Conflux
911 25
912 30
921 250
922 275
931 300
932 375
941 350
942 400
951 400
952 500
961 750
962 800
971 1500
972 2000
Neutral
011 10
012 40
021 150
022 100
031 200
032 300
041 400
042 401
051 500
052 501
061 750
062 751
071 10000
072 15000
073 20000
074 30000

If someone modifies it for me by substituting the AI value instead of those numbers, I would be very grateful. The key to understanding is: the first digit is the castle, the second digit is the level, and the third is either a modifier or, in the case of neutrals, simply a number. I am attaching pictures of the neutrals.

For now, I'll stick with the Hydra in my signature (yesterday I was playing SMOrc).

I would be very grateful if someone modified it for me by substituting an AI value instead of those numbers.

Here's the table: table. If there are too many units, you can remove the ones that haven't been updated.

I want to play in the seasonal mode, and I also need to implement image caching (right now, it redraws every time someone requests an image, and after a while, they'll start charging me for it or shut down the site). That's why I asked for help.

Added after 19 minutes
Temporarily disabled the banners until I implement caching. In one hour, it consumed 4 free hours out of the 28 available per day.

Total units – 141. In the general ranking – 591 players, but half of them are inactive or have played very few games. In the current seasonal ranking – 276, and in the HW ranking for some reason only 252. It would be better to sort not by cost, but by experience gained (list on this page, at the bottom), or according to Dirty's table. I suggest distributing monsters either based on their position in the ranking or somehow by levels with a progressive scale, so that level 7 units are given out one at a time, and level 1 units – 3-4. The upper limit should be higher than the current maximum, so that experienced players have something to strive for, and below, say, 1300 – give only peasants. Also, I propose setting a lower limit on the number of games played (20?), below which it is given regardless of rating, for example, a wild boar, because it is still unclear what skills the player has.

Total units - 141.
In the overall ranking - 591 players, but half of them are inactive or have played very few games.
In the current seasonal ranking - 276, and in the HW ranking, for some reason, only 252.

Because in the HW ranking, only players who have played 20 or more games are included.

Why is the rating different? Is it calculated differently?
http://heroes3stat.tk.mcpre.ru/rating/overall/microelf
http://heroes3stat.appspot.com/rating/overall/microelf

I understand that the first rating simply doesn't include the last 3 games, but before that, all the games are the same, and the rating clearly shows that it started to diverge and continues to diverge even more.

Why is the rating different? Is it calculated differently somehow?
http://heroes3stat.tk.mcpre.ru/rating/overall/microelf
http://heroes3stat.appspot.com/rating/overall/microelf

I understand that in the first ranking, there are simply no recent 3 games, but before that, all the games are identical, and you can see that the rating initially started to diverge, and then only diverges further.

In another thread about the rating, an answer to your question was already given: the iromanter's rating is calculated only based on existing reports on ХВ, while the previous rating was calculated using the original game information, so the number of points is different. /topic/7340/