Xocenk
Auto-translated
Previously, at a rating of 1600, there was a griffin; now, it's a champion. At 1800, there was a monarch; now, it's an archmage! Doesn't it seem that the rating gradation is no longer clear from the images?
Perhaps, we could revert to the old gradation but add intermediate units, since that's what you want.
Regarding the rating of old players, why ignore it? Just for the sake of having nice statistics on templates, castles, etc. (which can still exist with the old data, but won't be for all games, as I understand)? It sounds absurd and is disrespectful to them.
Perhaps, we could revert to the old gradation but add intermediate units, since that's what you want.
Regarding the rating of old players, why ignore it? Just for the sake of having nice statistics on templates, castles, etc. (which can still exist with the old data, but won't be for all games, as I understand)? It sounds absurd and is disrespectful to them.
ICQ - 703804372
Discord - Xocenk#2473
Discord - Xocenk#2473
