Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from What are you eating right now?Auto-translated
Of course. Pork is tender and has a pleasant texture, but it's relatively bland compared to lamb. It's like comparing cod and salmon (lamb is the salmon in this comparison).
I like them with spices. Here are some natural ones with paprika, pepper, and garlic. Yum! I also tried chips with lime and pepper. They are delicious, although they also contain a lot of glutamate. It has a too intrusive and strong taste, not always appropriate. But with meat, or maybe with sushi rolls, it's okay, but with chips, it's just too much.
I came to the same conclusion over time. Rifled weapons are just garbage, and neither cream-based nor cheese-based weapons are any good. But even rifled weapons are inferior to Astral.
>20180 >not having digestive problems and being in good health >getting offended by representatives of elite diets for their overly picky nature :(
Ment is right about the taste, and there’s a reason why pork is so cheap, although that’s not the only factor. Lamb, on the other hand, is pleasant and tasty, and it’s suitable for many dishes, except perhaps for soup. For soup, it’s best to use beef or chicken (if it’s with noodles, etc.).
>20180 >not having digestive problems and being a "normal" eater >getting offended at representatives of elite diets for their overly selective eating habits :(
— Not liking X in taste does not equal not being able to eat X due to health reasons; — Using subjective opinions and personal dietary restrictions is not a valid argument in your defense; — Assuming that your opponent is unaware (a "normal" eater) about dietary problems based on the fact that they, like you, do not mention them and do not use them in every discussion does not mean that they actually understand "selective eating" less than you do;
— Using subjective opinions and personal dietary preferences is not a valid argument in your defense;
Really? Then what is? And ultimately, we come to the conclusion that arguing about tastes is pointless, which is an outdated and uninteresting position that doesn't offer any discourse. Otherwise, I agree.
I initially expressed exactly that position, and I am defending it. But if there is some more modern and interesting approach that allows for meaningful discussion, rather than just empty talk about what tastes better, I will try, to the best of my limited ability, to understand it.
Besides, apart from a somewhat flawed comparison of lamb and pork, there was nothing even remotely similar to what I was writing about. Furthermore, in my post, which you inappropriately distorted, I was talking about pilaf and potatoes. So, perhaps you could show examples of the position you use as an argument in your favor?
Ment
Heroist
