Auto-translated
:) And in the other versions, the graphics are just amazing :) Of course, I'm not including the fifth one in this assessment :)
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
:) And in the other versions, the graphics are just amazing :) Of course, I'm not including the fifth one in this assessment :)
:) And in the other versions, the graphics are just amazing :) Of course, I'm not talking about the fifth one :)

It doesn't make sense to play without achieving certain successes and then discuss the highlights of each version.
A-a-a, you're even claiming that it's possible to determine the highlights of a version without even playing it. Well, then everything is clear – the conversation can end.
Thirdly, the graphics are beautiful. I really like it.
But when I remember the jellyfish from the fourth game...

Thirdly, the graphics are beautiful. I really like them. But when I remember the jellyfish from the fourth game...
I actually liked the Medusa in Heroes 4 more, precisely because she wasn't a beautiful woman in gold, but a monster...
but I found it and now I think it's one of the best in the series:)
To put it bluntly, it's reckless to reason like that! What does your logic have to do with it? If you say that a person cannot objectively evaluate a particular version or aspect without achieving "certain successes," what did you mean by that?
And what about the 5th game? The graphics aren't ideal there, or they are ideal but require a lot of resources :) The 5th game isn't weak, so it's unlikely that everyone can run it on maximum settings, and the graphics on medium settings aren't impressive...
That's all I'm saying. If a person doesn't achieve certain successes in the game on a particular version (and you can check how well a player plays in an online or offline tournament), then they clearly don't know much about its nuances, yet they start to argue and criticize. And you want to say that there's no logic in this statement? Well, it's clear that anyone can talk about the graphics, the beauty of the units, and the plot, and say whatever they want. But if you don't know anything, then you shouldn't start talking about gameplay, the balance of power, etc. Is that clearer to you?
I'm already losing track of the conversation - what do you want from me?
And when I remember the faces of the heroes from the third game, I shudder :) They are so well drawn :)
Awesome! Can you do more?! :D
And it turns out you're a real monster! - You achieve results, your achievements in ALL versions are listed on the Heroes websites, that's amazing! And why am I even talking to such a master?!
But you're talking about achievements on this portal? Oh, well, then I understand... And have you heard anything about other ones?
Although, okay, - I know what you're going to write now; so, are achievements in close circles (for example, in your own city) not considered achievements? Although, in principle, someone can't seem to live without this universal recognition, as if they won't have a decisive vote...
Self-esteem is a good thing, but only when it's excessive, then - you need to be treated for it. Good luck!
Never mind, I don't see the point anymore... You've already answered all my questions...
They say roughly the same nonsense as some people here, starting to compare versions – and I respond to them with roughly the same thing that I wrote to you here.
I can easily get myself a sick leave right now – but for now, I will refrain :)
Well, thank God :) I will consider that I have recovered :)
Those are strong words, you know that... especially knowing that the chance of us meeting is about 0 :), so I'll keep quiet, but you should be more modest too... :)
P.S. I apologize to the moderators for the off-topic, I'm sure ;) that this is all, right Iron?