Auto-translated
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
Can anyone explain how this can happen to a specific person?
Can anyone explain how this can happen to a specific person?
艰难获胜 herolwy
Posts from Forum
Wicc
8 years ago
Auto-translated
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
Can anyone explain how this can happen to a specific person?
Wicc
8 years ago
Auto-translated
2 Al Feyn
Delving into state policy risks having this discussion removed as spam, so it's better to focus on the realities of the game. For example, how the principle described above works in real-life situations.
Example #1 - organizing the CIS championship
Looking through the points in the list, it's clear that all 6 points are met here. Therefore, democracy is possible here.
And practice confirms this - this event has been held for 9 years through spontaneous self-organization, each time to everyone's satisfaction. And even if some disputes arise, they are due to an excess of enthusiasm and do not lead to serious consequences.
The only semi-exception is when, in 2017, when determining the location, a Schism almost occurred, and the rhetoric immediately began: "forget this democracy, the organizers need to agree among themselves." In full accordance with the theory outlined above... :)
Example #2 - developing HotA
Here, the situation is different - points #1, #2, #3, and partially #5 are not met (for other reasons). Therefore, democracy should be difficult here.
Again, practice confirms this - the development of HotA is carried out in a closed mode, and content is dictated from above.
Delving into state policy risks having this discussion removed as spam, so it's better to focus on the realities of the game. For example, how the principle described above works in real-life situations.
Example #1 - organizing the CIS championship
Looking through the points in the list, it's clear that all 6 points are met here. Therefore, democracy is possible here.
And practice confirms this - this event has been held for 9 years through spontaneous self-organization, each time to everyone's satisfaction. And even if some disputes arise, they are due to an excess of enthusiasm and do not lead to serious consequences.
The only semi-exception is when, in 2017, when determining the location, a Schism almost occurred, and the rhetoric immediately began: "forget this democracy, the organizers need to agree among themselves." In full accordance with the theory outlined above... :)
Example #2 - developing HotA
Here, the situation is different - points #1, #2, #3, and partially #5 are not met (for other reasons). Therefore, democracy should be difficult here.
Again, practice confirms this - the development of HotA is carried out in a closed mode, and content is dictated from above.
Auto-translated
I'd like to see more; I'm tired of waiting for the continuation (it's more interesting than any TV series).
Auto-translated
well, anything will do :confused: what are you looking at? ))
A real detective story - 1. Fargo Season 2 and Fargo Season 1.
The Young Pope (this one might be even better, but only for those who were interested in what Mark Aurelius and I were talking about).
This discussion is very poor compared to such series.
A real detective story - 1. Fargo Season 2 and Fargo Season 1.
The Young Pope (this one might be even better, but only for those who were interested in what Mark Aurelius and I were talking about).
This discussion is very poor compared to such series.
Wicc
8 years ago
Auto-translated
Wrestling tetons :D
Auto-translated
This is rhetoric from the 1990s. The events of the last 15 years have clearly shown that democracy has a tendency to turn into a "swan, crab, and pike" situation.
648050691
Wicc
8 years ago
Auto-translated
This was clear to everyone who understood the situation even back in the 19th century. But the image itself – "You decide, we only serve the people" – is ultimately appealing to the electorate. And I'm not talking about the results, but specifically about user loyalty.
A little [del]hypocrisy[/del] friendly attention to the needs of users hasn't hurt anyone yet.
But the established leaders don't have that resource; everyone already knows everything about them, so the most sensible step is to be honest – to explain in which areas democracy is possible in their opinion, and in which it is not.
Marmot
8 years ago
Auto-translated
Regarding democracy and dictatorship, I would still like to argue, but I don't want to add fuel to the fire that has already died down. I'll just say this: I don't agree with Wicc. And I'll add that reading the last ** pages was interesting in places, so you didn't waste your time writing all this, don't worry. :)
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було…
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
bubuch
8 years ago
Auto-translated
I'll put it simply: I agree with Wicc.
Just so it doesn't seem like everyone here is against it.
Just so it doesn't seem like everyone here is against it.
Russel_lDHl
8 years ago
Auto-translated
To put it simply: I agree with Wicc.
Just so there isn’t an impression that everyone here disagrees.
Auto-translated
To put it simply: I agree with Wicc.
ЯR
8 years ago
Auto-translated
that feeling when you wanted to say something "simple", but Al Feyn noticed it LUL
bubuch
8 years ago
Auto-translated
What exactly are you referring to?
As Dud says, name the THREE MAIN POINTS in which you agree with Wick.
Auto-translated
This rule does not apply when attacking a town/village.
The rules contain the following clause:
5.1. The so-called "red rush" is prohibited, meaning that a player playing as red is not allowed to attack on the first day of the week with reinforcements purchased on that day:
a) against a blue Castle (even if the Castle is not guarded)
b) against blue heroes or guarded mines, if the presence of reinforcements can affect the outcome of the battle or losses in the battle for either player.
Question - why is there a difference between clauses a and b?
What is the deep meaning behind this?
Why are there stricter requirements for attacking a Castle?
In Miron's message, which Sanin is strangely deleting instead of just deleting the "insults," there was also constructive feedback. There are no rules regarding mirror matches in the competition.
Added after 25 minutes
The second question, which also involves Sanin and Faria.
The tables have been updated. The deadline for the two matches in the 1/2 stage is June 4th.
An ODD (one-on-one duel) has been scheduled for the match between Xocenk and Faria on May 13th at 6:00 PM Moscow time. The minimum game time is 5 hours; if one player is more than an hour late, a technical defeat will be awarded.
And what is the penalty if one of the opponents leaves the game before 5 hours have passed?
ICQ - 703804372
Discord - Xocenk#2473
Discord - Xocenk#2473
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb