Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Beauty that you want to share.Auto-translated
Well, sorry, I'm a newbie playing Overwatch in Russian (or rather, not playing much right now). And I'm seeing this comic in translation for the first time.
But here, the facial features, the shape of the eyebrows, the hairstyle, and the outfit are completely different.
And she doesn't seem to be a tech enthusiast (I'm not sure about the cats).
But here, the facial features, the shape of the eyebrows, the hairstyle, and the outfit are completely different. And she doesn't seem to be a tech enthusiast (I'm not sure about the cats).
Young, red-haired, freckled, a nerd – that satisfies Ment's tastes – check, check, check, check, check. If people devoted more effort to finding common ground and less to focusing on differences, phenomena like arrogance, envy, dislike, bullying, Nazism, and jihad wouldn't exist in their current form.
The comic is actually sad, if you know the backstory of these characters even a little.
I saw a comparison with a character from Paladins online, but maybe Lock is also right. This is common in game development; certain templates emerge, and many people create content based on them. After all, it's difficult to introduce something completely new and unique into a gamer's mind that they will like, and not many succeed.
Where did you find redheads here? The rest is just funny to read. You could have posted Gage just as well. It would satisfy your criteria.
If people devoted more effort to finding common ground and less to focusing on differences, phenomena such as arrogance, envy, dislike, bullying, Nazism, and jihad would not exist in their current form.
I don't even know what to say in response to that.
)))
Again, I don't understand what's funny here.
You could have just as easily posted a picture of Gage. It would have satisfied your criteria.
That's true, I could have. But there's a problematic aspect to her: she's an edgy delinquent, and those types don't really fit the "Muse of Ment" archetype.
That's how it is in game development; certain templates emerge, and many people create content based on them. It's difficult to introduce something completely new and unique into the minds of gamers that they will like, and not many succeed.
That's essentially the original target audience for my post: an open-minded "Ment" with the analytical mind of a scientist, who, due to the nature of his thinking, invests energy in moving forward, searching for patterns, and striving for a more organized system of perceiving the world, rather than dismissing everything and disregarding the obvious, like a caveman.
It's funny to hear this from a person who often posts about "pushing minorities into TV shows" and has laughed at victims of bullying more than once or twice, and has actively participated in this bullying himself.
Actually, this is the original target audience of my post: an open-minded "Cop" with the analytical mind of a scientist, who, due to the principle of his thinking, invests energy in moving forward, searching for patterns, and striving for a more orderly system of perceiving the world, rather than waving his hand at everything and discarding the obvious, like a caveman.
What the "Cop" said is obvious to everyone, but it doesn't match your post. Because you don't have a template; you only have a series of rather superficial traits, which are not enough to form it. And this is clear to anyone, not just someone with an analytical mind, but simply someone who is not devoid of common sense. And not to a scientist from the Middle Ages, for whom a bat is a bird because it can fly.
and he laughed at the victims of bullying more than once, and also actively participated in this bullying himself
For example?
It's funny to hear this from a person who
Ad hominem. Incredibly interesting, novel, and constructive. I'm already running to dispute something.
you don't have a template, you only have a number of rather superficial traits, insufficient to form it
But if the face and eyebrows were different, and if the hairstyle and clothing were the same, then you would agree, and there would be a checkmark for every item in your notebook. And if they looked exactly the same, it would be even easier to see the pattern. Keep me updated. It's your opinion, you don't have to agree, I don't care. As I said, you are not the target audience for my post. An appeal to the majority, which is quite controversial, also does not add weight to the opinion.
By the way, I've always found it amusing how different meanings people attribute to this term: some only refer to those with fiery red hair, while others consider anyone who isn't blonde or brunette to be a redhead. For some, the girl in my avatar isn't a redhead, while others would call the girl in Ment's avatar a redhead.
The comic is actually sad, if you know the backstory of these characters even a little.
I agree. That's its charm – it's both sad and funny at the same time.
Added 9 minutes later Damn, it just occurred to me who Bridgette really reminds me of:
Ah, and one more thing. I didn't even bother to explain the "obvious" fact that my initial post (and the one that followed) wasn't entirely serious, which is evident from the three exclamation marks, the semi-memetic phrase itself, and the deliberately chosen, most hideous artwork, even though Google had plenty of more appealing and more similar images. But the simple-minded Ples so desperately wanted to aggressively jump into the fray and provoke me into defending this point of view that now I see no reason not to believe it's actually true, especially given his sarcastic and practically non-existent argumentation.
By the way, I've always found it amusing how different meanings people ascribe to this concept: some only refer to fiery-redheads, while others consider anyone who isn't blonde or brunette to be a redhead. For some, the girl in my avatar isn't a redhead, while others would call the girl in Ment's avatar a redhead.
Ment's artwork also has different shades in different pictures, sometimes darker, sometimes brighter. Personally, I believe that if the color is like in your photo or avatar, and especially if there are freckles on top, then you can safely call it redhead and be right.
Well, generally yes, I would say so. For me, red hair is when you can call it orange or red. The benchmark is a fox, basically. Anything closer to that, rather than blonde or chestnut, is considered red. In this regard, I don't see anything red-haired on this page. But yes, it's a bit subjective, no one has set any standards.
For example? Your numerous jokes about the backpack are in the spirit of "haha, losers, you were bullied in school, and that's why you're so jumpy." As for the objects of bullying, one can recall Tengro, a very polite and pleasant person to communicate with, who left the Hive thanks to your efforts.
Ad hominem.
It is inappropriate to use this expression in this context. The argument (which was irrelevant) was not being disputed; it was simply noted that it was amusing to hear it from you. It was not relevant to the discussion at all. It's also amusing because you were the first to resort to personal attacks.
that my initial post (as well as the one that followed) was not one hundred percent serious, which is evident from the three exclamation marks and the semi-memetic phrase itself.
Did anyone say that it was completely serious? However, even for such a joke, you need to choose someone who is at least somewhat similar.
specifically chosen the most hideous artwork, although there were many more attractive and similar ones on Google.
Leaving aside the comment about "hideous" (which is unclear why it was made and doesn't really fit), it's unclear why you chose this artwork. It works against the joke.
But the simple-minded Ples so desperately wanted to aggressively interfere again and provoke me into defending this point of view.
Oh, that evil Ples, give him a chance to get Lok involved in a discussion and provoke him into resorting to personal attacks. Not that he couldn't just not respond if he didn't want to? Oh, but of course, it's my fault. I'm the terrible, cunning, simple-minded villain. I understand that you are always poor and innocent, standing in a white coat, but you decided to respond to me. And to resort to personal attacks. But it's all my fault, of course, not yours. Seriously. And I'm not pretending that I have no fault in the current situation. I mean, I know that you are a very complex person who likes to resort to personal attacks, put on airs, and be rude, but I still responded to your post. Although I should have already gotten used to the fact that it's easier to ignore them. And I shouldn't have pointed out your own toxicity by resorting to personal attacks myself. Even if you were the first to resort to personal attacks. It had nothing to do with the discussion in the end. I should have just walked away.
I apologize to the forum members for what Lok and I have done here. I consider the discussion closed. Not that there will be anything else, except for reciprocal mudslinging.
Ple-Sen
WishmasteR
