Auto-translated
Don't be ridiculous!:rolleyes: You know perfectly well what Lava Dragons are. Against Black Dragons, which are immune to magic, they can't do much, and they also move slowly; only runes help them. :)
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Don't be ridiculous!:rolleyes: You know perfectly well what Lava Dragons are. Against Black Dragons, which are immune to magic, they can't do much, and they also move slowly; only runes help them. :)
Wow, only runes help them; that's how we reason about the overall strength. With the Elves, luck also helps them a little, but we don't consider them without luck. And the main drawback of the Elves is their sworn enemy, which is a very questionable characteristic. I have nothing against them in an army!!!
Has anyone thought about creating another summoned creature for the Dark faction? For example, the ultimate enemy of the Phoenix - the Basilisk!
First of all, I agree that you have a way with words. Secondly, you didn't understand what I said. I meant that if Lava Dragons aren't controlled by a Dwarf, and no one else has runes, then the Lava Dragons are useless. But if an Emerald or Black Dragon is controlled by someone else, it won't make them weaker. The "sworn enemy" and "luck" aspects are irrelevant here. We're talking about the most powerful warrior in any army, looking only at their own capabilities. :smile13:
Added after 1 minute
Look at the topic "SWAMP." I want to make it a level 7 creature of the Swamp Fortress.
You didn't say that, you said that runes are the only thing that helps them; it's just one of their advantages, like the fact that magic doesn't affect the Castle. I just argued that they aren't weak, but rather quite strong and decent armies of Dwarves. Just don't elevate your favorites by putting down other worthy opponents; look for the positive aspects of your point of view!!!
ALUKARD
You didn't say that, you said that runes are the only thing that helps them; it's just one of their advantages, like the fact that magic doesn't work on the Castle Dark, and I just argued that they aren't bad, but quite strong and decent armies of dwarves. Just don't elevate your favorites at the expense of belittling other worthy opponents; look for the positive aspects of your point of view!!!
It's just that if you consider using Runes on a Lava Dragon to be a bonus, then I would consider a lucky Shock attack with Boots to be a bonus for a Black Dragon :)
If the question is specifically about combat prowess, then it's best to just check. Take two heroes with equal stats and no skills or spells, preferably from allied but not native Factions (this is fairer for neutral units if they are involved in the discussion). And just have them fight; if the victory isn't clear-cut, then they are roughly equal. :)
But if you take into account abilities, growth, or special combat conditions, then you could argue that a Gremlin with a cart can defeat a Phoenix or a Black Dragon. (Imagine a map where in the corner, on a 2x2 tile, there is an obstacle, on a 1x1 tile there is a Gremlin, and there are several more obstacles in front of the cart, and the Black Dragon simply can't attack anyone...)
I agree with Supreme, Silovik's Runes are not a bonus for the Lava Dragon, and luck is not a bonus for the Black Dragon. :rolleyes: And besides, any creature can have luck (it all depends on the hero)! The Lava Dragon's ability is fire resistance, the Black Dragon's is magic resistance, and the Emerald Dragon's is earth magic resistance. And then it all depends on attack, defense, damage, initiative, and so on.
Yes, but what about your words: The Emerald Dragon and the Black Dragon are the best, and the Lava Dragon is useless! The Phoenix is a summoned creature, and you can only summon one, but you can gather many dragons! And that's despite the fact that the Lava Dragon has the highest HP and defense of all dragons and doesn't cost much!!!
I think the Black Dragon and the Archangel are the best, the Emerald Dragon is useless - have you ever tried pitting 10 Emerald Dragons against 10 Archangels? If the Emerald Dragons attack first, they will kill a maximum of two winged creatures, and then the counterattack, and goodbye to at least 4 Emerald Dragons. And the resurrection of the Feathered is very useful, and there's nothing to say about the Black Dragon!
I agree, those are your opinions. But I don't consider runes to be a special skill for Emerald Dragons, and I don't consider luck to be a skill for Imps! I offered my point of view on the best and most powerful warrior, and I explained the drawbacks of Emerald Dragons.
Added 4 minutes later
It all depends on the hero's level. If you put heroes with the first level against Emerald Dragons, they will easily defeat Archangels, Archdevils, and Twilight Dragons. They are on par with the Titan and the Lava Dragon and the Black Dragon. I've tried this many times, by the way, also 10 vs. 10.
Are you talking about the first one? Well, I'm certainly not a master; I wasn't even close to being on the same level as the masters, but wouldn't a normal player wait for 10 dragons to appear and not develop their hero at all? That's just stupid!
Well, you can do that just to test it, but I think a normal player would develop along with the growth of their troops...
I tried it when I was level 20 and my opponent was level 20, and Emerald Archangels just wiped them out.
I haven't tried it on the first one, so I can't say anything about it. How is it and what's it like there.