Posts from Forum

Vik, what made you think that this is an abuse of the game's mechanics and a terrible imbalance that shouldn't exist in a mirror match? How did you come to this conclusion, and where are the more detailed arguments? Because you want people to thoroughly refute you, but you treat your own theses as undeniable truths.

Yura, it's never too late to win back the people's love!)))

Well, that's the ideology behind mirror matches, as I understand it. The less randomness in a mirror match, the closer it is to chess, the better.

This position doesn't need to be argued; it's self-evident to me and doesn't require proof.

You can disagree with it, but that would be like arguing about "God in heaven or Allah." In other words, if someone wants to preach a different ideology, let them do it in their own tournaments.

Once again, what makes you think this will introduce more randomness? Where are your calculations and proof that randomly killing a powerful hero or a support hero during a rush or when an opponent randomly selects one of many possible cities to attack will be less frequent and less dispersed than the ability to bring that hero or support hero back to continue the balanced fight?

Randomness is equal for everyone (except for Maretti).

In the event of two heroes dying in battle, with at least one of them being level 10 or higher, neither of these heroes can be purchased again in this game.
If the unlikely happens and two such heroes appear in the tavern at the same time, then you need to (cleanse your karma) buy one, immediately dismiss him, and buy the next one; buying a hero will cost 5k instead of 2.5.

Here is the wording of the rule, as it should be, if I understood ATG's idea correctly.

If they had chosen favorites, it would have been better, and it wouldn't have been like a "dock-dock" situation. I'm sure very few people would choose a "dock" (especially from the "daddies"). I would 100% choose Inferno.

p.s. After Lucky, De Luxe, and my decisions to withdraw from these "mirrors," I'm sure Alex will also seriously consider whether he needs this tournament. Yura, it's never too late to regain the people's love!)))

I don't think it's difficult to figure out if there were 2 main heroes in a battle where mutual suicide occurred...

This will end with the 3rd season of Admiral's Hat. Therefore, it is better to take measures in advance and specify the conditions.

Heroes, regardless of their level, who are mutually destroyed in battle cannot be revived in a tavern.
Ideally, a defeated hero should disappear from the game at the software level. The idea is good, but the way it's presented is a bit confusing. Just leave it as is for now, Yura – you've done a great job, but maybe step back a bit and introduce this rule for future tournaments.

Heroes, regardless of their level, who are mutually destroyed in battle cannot be revived in a tavern.
Ideally, a dead hero should disappear from the game at the software level.