Mafia 47. Battle of Movie Heroes Auto-translated

The way the events that happened to Arcomage are described is somewhat reminiscent of Dexter. At least, there everything is also told from the first person. Another thing is that he might not be the only character like that.

Added 1 minute ago
And it's unlikely that they will "just like that" reveal everything about Archi.

Good point, Pless. I haven't watched Dexter, though. But I don't think Spear would so obviously reveal his role as a Mafia member.

I wouldn't execute anyone right now.

Plausible, quite.

Are you confused by the instructions you're getting in the chat?

Heh :). Or did you miss Tox's post when you wrote the first message?

No, guys, I'm afraid I've already searched for everything significant by Bradbury. The only thing I can do is connect his "Fahrenheit 451" to the burning candles in Lordick's profile, but that's a blatant stretch.

The rake is combined with the axe.

Exactly, that's what I was going to say, it turns out to be nonsense.

Damn, I searched through the profiles, but didn't find anything useful. Although, there should be a clue there, maybe 4-5 moves in. I think it will be difficult to figure out what's going on based on the first clue...

Regarding the Night Discussion, I thought about it. I decided that the Mafia had Moriarty and Joker. This move is reasonable because the Mafia gets a great chance to frame the blocked players. And from this, we can also conclude that the Mafia has one player who cares a lot about the game.
I won't be able to provide evidence today. I'd prefer to consider the newspaper about Ara as a bad description (the part that couldn't be interpreted) at this stage.

Torium, die, or they will REMOVE YOUR FACTION.

Damn, I didn't have time to read it, why did you delete it!

Added 34 seconds later
I'm just saying, yeah, rules, rules.

There, Thor simply threatened the maniac with severe consequences.

at least it’s clear that I’m not a maniac).

So, are we not going to execute him? Did Jack offer some kind of explanation?

Nobody cares. But you'll remember us, you'll see, when it's too late.

I like the evidence against Jack. And he's not acting quite normally, he's looking for clues. Can you remind me when he last did that? And the last argument: voting for him is definitely not an option, as I personally don't want to become a victim of Saw.
Execute Jack.