Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Ninada.

This is how the association with completely passive bots on an easy difficulty level arises, who resignedly await their fate, but no, this is real life. Interesting.

In real life, there were also non-aggression pacts, and upon their expiration, the state was not allowed to attack another state for quite a long time – for example, a year. And as a child, I didn't understand why in global games against bots, it was necessary to break the peace treaty and then wait another turn or two before invading another territory with thousands of units that you had been quietly gathering on the border, because you were already enemies and destroying each other, what kind of concepts from middle school are these?
Now, of course, it is obvious that this does not happen in real life, and the title of a disgraced rogue nation will remain with the aggressor for centuries, and it will simply be strangled and driven into a remote corner. In this regard, humanity has achieved the greatest progress in its entire history to date, it's hard to believe.

Wow, you really went hard on Germany.

I can repeat.

Nice survey for schoolkids.

Should I answer the last question with a “yes” or will they call the principal?

A very strange principle for grouping subcultures.

I've been alive for so long, and I didn't know that furries and anime fans are the same thing...

Will I get in trouble with the principal if I don't answer the last question positively?

-What are your feelings towards the Russian Federation?
-Yes.

A very strange principle for grouping subcultures.

Judging by "vinishko (tyan, kun)" – people have no idea what they are being asked. Maybe they just took random words based on a Google search for "subcultures."

It’s a shame about the steampunk theme.

I always knew there was something off about steampunk.

-What feelings do you have towards the Russian Federation?
-Yes.

I would clarify here: "Do you mean the country or the state?"

What's the point? It's already so obvious what the question logically means, what they intend, and then they'll write it in the reports, and that the first and second are completely unrelated things.

I would clarify here: "Do you mean a country or a state?"

In Russia, these concepts are closely interconnected. To love the "country" means to love the people, culture, cuisine, and nature. The people – wild Barbarians, slaves under the Mongols, filthy serfs, Soviet slave informers, modern boors, that is, a people oppressed by power for centuries, and moreover, an imperial multinational one, uncooperative, conflicting with itself and with the law. Traditional cuisine is a consequence of a poor lifestyle: pies, cabbage soup, porridge, potatoes, sour cream, kvass, filling one's belly with carbohydrates and going to the field. The rest is borrowed. The culture also exudes depression, the theme of nepotism, serfdom, overcoming obstacles against officials or the Soviet system, bows to Europe (from which it also borrowed architecture, some features of the state structure, a huge number of words in the dictionary, and a million other things); or neutral, unoriginal themes – love, nature, and childhood. Modern "culture" is an absolute cargo cult, an exact copy from the West, plus crime series and dramas about infidelity and affairs in twenty square meters in a Khrushchev-era apartment, and songs by decaying Soviet performers. All this was created either with the support of the state, or permeated with its strong influence and created in spite of it. Nature: forests, swamps, potholes, leaden depressing sky, dirt, snow, garbage, hay – the only thing not directly related to the state, and nevertheless, from this point of view, too, many points can be raised – thousands of kilometers of undeveloped poor territory, poor communication, wild centralization, hundreds of small, captured alien peoples, single-industry towns for iron ore mining in the middle of nowhere, scattered decaying villages.
In general, you are unlikely to fool an inquisitive person with such a question; he will ask you in more detail, and then make you write a long, terrible statement.

In no way am I calling anyone to anything, I am not revising the results of any historical processes, I am satisfied with everything and fully support our elected president Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. Our country, state, and people are the best and greatest heroes, and the text above is a quote from memory of a question from one of my former classmates in high school, addressed to my beloved, respected literature teacher, Izolda Veniaminovna, a staunch patriot and the best hardworking, intelligent woman in my life, who shattered the opinion of this curious student with her brilliant, skillful arguments and reasoning to smithereens, and so beautifully that he almost on his knees and in tears admitted how wrong he was, that the Western propaganda from television was to blame for everything, and promised that he would pray for her health and for the health of all citizens of Russia. I provide this text to the citizen of the Russian Federation, Hermit, exclusively for informational purposes, as a basis for possible discussions with paid prostitutes of the US State Department in the future, if they stand in his way and try to dissuade him from the only correct way of thinking.
And this student later began to go to church, observe Lent and other Orthodox customs, graduated with honors from a military school, and bravely defended all our citizens in Syria, and all thanks to the brilliant logic and teaching talent of Izolda Veniaminovna, and, of course, the undeniable greatness of our people, state, and country.