Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

in fact, it's a kind of stone-based organism that is quite capable of moving on its own.
Although, perhaps, Allah also had a hand in bringing them to life.

These are trolls.

who trolled scientists, journalists, and the general public until someone smart figured out how to place recording equipment in the right spot.

I won't argue about the selection of questions being strange.

But that's exactly what I meant – the selection is actually quite good, because even in contrast to stereotypical football, cars, and even guns (even though they are present), you can still get a good representation of masculinity. The only debatable question is about the bed, and instead of the word "guns," I would use "weapons," because, well, you know why.

...

That's an interesting and, in some ways, understandable way to protest, Doug. The problem is that most people here know at least a basic level of English. As for German, it's only you, and maybe one or two other people, and they're probably not from the general chat.

))) I didn't know they actually existed.

Me neither. I feel like a great theorist.

and also, instead of the word "cannons," I would use "weapons," because, well, you know why.

By the way, yes. I said that I like "cannons" more, but I would give the maximum rating to "weapons" in general or "swords" in particular.

Siever, I would phrase it a little differently, but it's good as is. I even felt fifteen years younger... And that's when the urge to talkativeness struck, just like in the old days. *a senile rattle in the voice and the creak of unlubricated joints*

Added 1 minute ago
And yes, I already understand written English, albeit at a basic level!

even if, despite all the stereotypical football, cars, and even guns (even though they are present), one can still achieve a healthy sense of masculinity.

Regarding the topic of video games.

I wonder which of the ancient sages is older: Dag or Yashur.

A question about video games.

It's a normal question, and it gives as many as 111 points.

A perfectly normal question, it gives as many as 111 points.

It gives 5 points, actually. The average value is 100, although deviations of up to 15 points in either direction are acceptable.
As I see it, the question is still a bit strange. At least, it's stranger than stereotypical footballs and cannons, considering that the test should provide a list of traits traditionally associated with masculinity. That is, stereotypes. Because all this "masculinity" and "femininity" (not counting certain traits of appearance, although there are also vague points regarding hairstyles) is based on stereotypes. It is unlikely that, when imagining a stereotypical man (the so-called "real man"), anyone would imagine that he is a gamer. Rather, he doesn't think about it much.

The average value is 100, although deviations of 15 points in either direction are acceptable.

Alex has 120 points; how should we interpret this "unacceptable" deviation?

At least, it's less stereotypical than footballs and cannons, considering that the test should provide a list of traits traditionally associated with masculinity.

Masculinity is traditionally associated with the ability to hammer a nail into a wall and shoot a mammoth to drag it into a cave. Are you sure you understand the purpose of the test correctly?