Auto-translated
Well, here we go again. This topic has been brought up for the second time, and it has failed both times. Maybe it's time to realize that no one needs a "Heroes International"? Everything is fine on the forum as it is.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Well, here we go again. This topic has been brought up for the second time, and it has failed both times. Maybe it's time to realize that no one needs a "Heroes International"? Everything is fine on the forum as it is.
Well, here we go again. This topic has been brought up for the second time, and it has failed both times. Maybe it's time to realize that no one needs a "Heroic International"? Everything is fine on the forum as it is.
Но поскольку я нищий,
у меня лишь есть мечты.
Я разостлал свои мечты пред вашими ногами.
Ступайте бережно, ибо вы ступаете по моим мечтам.
Andrey, I think you should read this thread from the very beginning to this point more carefully. If this means that "everything is fine on the forum," then I don't understand what needs to happen here for something to be done... World War 3?
There have already been several cases of forum users arguing in some sections simply because of differing opinions. The same discussion in the chat about the Heroic International turned into a terrible dispute, ready to escalate into a quarrel. What's normal about that, Andrey?
That's not what I'm talking about. I didn't mean any single opinion, which definitely cannot exist on a forum with so many people. It's just that a group of people will appear who, seeing that someone is arguing, will try to resolve these disputes.
Yes, I agree - it won't be interesting without arguments, but only if these are arguments without swearing and insults.
Firstly, there are too many moderators. Secondly, do moderators need to be the only ones ensuring everything is decent on the forum? Should the other participants just observe and, if something doesn't appeal to them, say: "The moderators aren't doing their job" (we haven't seen that yet, thankfully). Wouldn't it be easier for them to help with this? Do you think the "Random Links" section was created for no reason?
I don't understand what this has to do with anything. We don't need any "super moderators." Indeed, the best help is not to create any problems yourself. However, not everyone understands this, and not everyone acts accordingly. I think we should help the site staff with this.
Of course, if the moderators say they don't need our help and can manage on their own, then it's clear that no one will interfere. Maybe we should ask the moderators?