Knights of Tezoth

Ah, I need to get to work on the Knight titles faster, before Karneya pulls something...

I still deeply don't care about these two NPCs. Nobody is obligated to fight for Kanamia on the hill. Albus stood purely with his own circle. No more, no less. In the end, Kanamia simply outnumbered Albus. But while Albus's knights can trust each other, the lone knights don't really trust the capital's thuggish organized crime group.

What annoys me here is exclusively the balance with a monstrous bias toward mounts. Moreover, we've already reached the point where a regular mount like a horse is hopelessly weak, while flying ones are cool because they're simply invulnerable to melee fighters. And you can be a very strong melee fighter, critting for 500-600, but... what's the point.

"Rogue," in Lester's spellbook, refers to a fighting style, Astral...

All the mind-blowing mechanics are gathered in one place. Just a reminder that in AA you had to pay upkeep for having a companion pet. Even that is better than it being completely free.

I wouldn't call the horse weak. In a matchup of horse archer vs. pegasus archer, the horse, depending on the terrain, can be the preferable choice.

Yeah, Lester seems like last century... stealth units have existed in Revan's expeditions for a long time. Though, abilities to detect them weren't added this time around...

Lester, in a fit of rage, ended up in the strong melee fighter category.

In the "random hates you" category.

Yashchur, I'm not trying to start a fight here, but I can't wrap my head around one of your positions — who exactly is this artist you're so worked up about, that players don't want a NON-player to win?

Let's start with the fact that Revan himself declared the Albus alliance. He did it openly, and most likely his intention was for us to also band together. There's logic to that.

And so we united not just against random bots, but against very strong overleveled characters. Nobody said anything about handing the victory to some specific player.

But you got all bent out of shape over us being so bad for "categorically not wanting bots to win." Can you answer me why we should even want mobs to win? What good does it do any of us in terms of RP or, say, min-maxing? Who would deliberately want to get bent over by GM-controlled characters?

They were brought in. Available to rare characters, but they were brought in. And the radius there is good.

I don't know about those games I missed, but in the old ones, detection, if it existed at all, was a skill that unlocked as you progressed through the game. And stealth now costs not only a turn, but also a valuable resource. A proper change, overall.

When the plan to take down Kendl first in the brawl appeared, I immediately realized it would be my first and possibly last action, and sooner or later I'd be torn apart without a chance by those infamous mounted archers, like it happened at the tournament. But I didn't make a fuss so as not to ruin anyone's mood.

/ What's going on? Where did you see any negativity from Yashchur? I only see funny stuff like "ha-ha, players are playing along with each other" /

You could have at least warned us, you know.

don't know bro. I'm still waiting for us to finish this slop and finally go into the game to have some fun. we're sitting here, rambling for thirty pages of grayness about who knows what, nickel-and-diming, and complaining in circles about the same thing.

You're an invisibility user.

You go invisible on the very first turn, hoping to finish off the winner at the end of the battle.

The winner is flying. You can't reach them.

The winner can't see you and also can't reach you.

A week has passed. The opponent's creature finally died of thirst, and you finished off the rider.

Your patience is unbreakable.

Your will is unwavering.

You're just an ordinary guy from Ravnland.

Waiting for Revan again, I suppose?