New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Nice! Want a quick tour of this page too?
Show the author's original text and human translations first. Machine translation is used only when nothing else exists.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Permanent is not the same as seasonal.
Permanent differs from seasonal in that it is not reset at the beginning of the season. You can win a season, but fall in the permanent ranking.
As I understand it, the results of each season accumulate, with a cumulative total. I think the word "ACCUMULATES" is quite fitting, don't you?:smile01:
Permanent rankings are not based on seasonal scores.
The difference between permanent and seasonal rankings is that permanent rankings are not reset at the beginning of a season. You can win a seasonal ranking, but your permanent ranking might decrease.
Permanent rankings are not based on seasonal rankings.
The difference between permanent and seasonal rankings is that permanent rankings are not reset at the beginning of a season. You can win a seasonal ranking, but your permanent ranking can still drop.
How is that even possible? I can understand if it was Maretti, who won the season but with a slightly lower score.
If you play against an opponent with a significantly lower rating, you'll gain very little rating points upon winning (if the difference is more than 400 points, you get +1 for a win and -32 for a loss, I think), so farming rating points against noobs isn't the best idea.
I don't think the tournament rating is any better than the general one (seasonal + tournament). In the group stages of tournaments, you often encounter weak opponents, while in the season, some specifically look for stronger players.
You're explaining this to the wrong audience, Kostik)))
Better find a candidate for this heavy burden, or is it already decided and Nitro will be doing it?;)
The_
As I understand it, they are proposing the following:
- A permanent rating is based on the results of tournament matches, which fairly reflects the player's skill level.
- The rating in the seasonal mode largely depends on the player's activity; moreover, in the seasonal mode, you can choose any opponent, unlike in a tournament match.
A logical option:
1) Introduce a permanent rating based on the results of tournament matches. 2) Consider all games in the seasonal mode as games within a single seasonal tournament, and upon completion of the season, add/subtract points to the permanent rating depending on the result in the seasonal tournament.
In this case, games in the seasonal mode will have less impact on the rating, and the permanent rating can be used when drawing groups/forming brackets in knockout tournaments.
Nitro
As I understand it, they are proposing the following:
- A permanent rating is based on the results of tournament games, which fairly reflects the player's level.
- The rating in the seasonal mode largely depends on the player's activity; moreover, in the seasonal mode, you can choose any opponent, unlike a tournament game.
A logical option:
1) Introduce a permanent rating based on the results of tournament games. 2) Consider all games in the seasonal mode as games within a single seasonal tournament, and after the season ends, add/subtract points in the permanent rating depending on the result in the seasonal tournament.
In this case, games in the seasonal mode will have less impact on the rating, and the permanent rating can be used when drawing groups/forming brackets in knockout tournaments.
The_
Yeah, a game is a game.
This is a bad approach. Because today you will remove the season from the permanent ranking, and tomorrow there will be a dispute that some Tournaments are not worthy of being in the permanent ranking, etc.
KobRa_RR
