Voting for the location of the CIS-2107 tournament.

Funny. The voting system was announced before the voting itself. You and any dissatisfied parties had the opportunity to intervene. For example, with a post like this: "I disagree with Merlin's point system because of this and that. I propose this and that." Mee wrote about some kind of cartel agreement between competing organizers when the trend towards Volgograd's victory became clear based on the current point system. But no. Everyone voted. They waited for the results. According to these results, Volgograd's victory is obvious based on a number of criteria. If, for example, Dirty, Bayazet, and a number of other regulars who didn't vote now write that they didn't vote because they consider this voting system unsuitable and not reflective of the audience's objective preferences, and offer something of their own, that would be constructive. But as it is, there have always been, are, and always will be dissatisfied people. In general, I agree with you. Now it may be too late to change anything. When you write comments without constructive suggestions, you end up just criticizing. Moreover, the organizer has already acknowledged the voting results (as I understand it). This discussion may be useful for the future organization of the CIS tournament. I think that we, Yekaterinburg, as a possible future venue for the CIS tournament, can take these comments into account and make the next application much better (deadlines, prices, gifts for the right people, bribing the judges, etc.).