Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I wrote that it's possible to translate the problem into a plane and prove that for any point inside a convex polygon, you can draw a perpendicular to one of the sides, so that the end of the perpendicular falls on the side itself, and not its extension. Well, there you kind of divide this thing into triangles with angles vertex-vertex-center and calculate the heights, maybe it's also worth considering the 360 degrees and so on, I don't feel like solving it further.
Yeah, it's quite possible that it can be done that way. I don't see any significant differences.
Because, as Uranian pointed out, they would have used it a long time ago.
Who knows, maybe people are just stupid and didn't figure it out...