Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
A large number of teams with 3 players will result in several very strong teams, as if the same number of people sign up as in OzV-4, it will be difficult to find 28 players of approximately equal skill.
Well, what can you do if the players don't have equal skill? What, in your opinion, are the conditions for selecting a strong team? If you look at the history of the tournament, in almost all tournaments, the teams that were not initially considered favorites won. The exception was the first tournament; Gomungul's team was initially a favorite, and the main reason for that was the DRAFT (this is another drawback of tournaments; there should be no transfers). skd
The goal of the changes is to level the playing field.
What nonsense. To level the chances of all teams, they need to be formed manually, for example, put Gomunguls in the same team as DaU :smile32:. With any regulations, there will be teams that will be obvious underdogs, but who is to blame if they choose "not to care"?