Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If we take the practical criterion of "what is most advantageous to put in harm's way during an attack" (based on which Titans were suddenly classified as tanks), then the best "tanks" are level 1 units, and even better are level 2 units with high defense. They are, admittedly, disposable, but they can withstand attacks of any size (with almost no losses). These are the ideal tanking units (according to that criterion).
So, perhaps we shouldn't use the term "tank" for a unit with low survivability, like the Titan?
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат