Post-tournament analysis and discussion of the CIS Tournament Regulations.

I decided to chime in as well. Let me explain to some of those who are waving their fists around, saying "let's not allow it," "this isn't a tournament, it's something else," "let's reconsider," "he doesn't deserve it." Yes, you're getting annoying with your whining. The second round is underway, and we're getting closer to the final stage. Lizard hasn't lost yet and really wants to reach the finals. Reddi already has a loss. As a result, Lizard is taking extreme measures, which are technically legal with some caveats, with the sole purpose of preserving his chances in this tournament, and nothing more. There are still many games ahead against skilled opponents. He acted unpleasantly, but this action only gave him a chance; it's not buying the game, it's not buying the tournament. It's a flaw in the system when the winner faces a loser in the second round. And wouldn't buying a free slot be the same thing in your opinion? Moreover, it's even cheaper. Essentially, if someone who won the tournament by going through one of the rounds with a free slot was like Lizard. He was unlucky with the free slot in the second round, and he decided to buy it. Then Mizrael simply handed the win to Lizard; those who saw their game know this. Mizrael choked. The chance of facing a maximum-level opponent was 10% (go away immediately, mathematicians who are ready to nitpick this; I know everything myself), and he got it. Then Aive did something incredible against Hell. And then the Swiss system made Lizard the winner. So, who is to blame? Maybe Mizrael, maybe Aive, the Swiss system, and if we remember the generator, it's here too? Everything was very delicate. The moment when Lizard bought Reddi didn't decide anything, but it decided everything. Many things came together, and Lizard's purchase fit well into the overall picture. P.S.: Everyone understands this, the reasonable people. Look at how Hell reacted. He should be the most offended, but he sees the bigger picture. Yes, I was rooting for Kostya myself, but I wanted a final between Hell and Lizard, but unfortunately, it didn't happen. This is all thanks to Mizrael, and I feel very sorry for him. Why aren't the participants themselves writing "disqualify," "strip of the title," and other nonsense? Should we disqualify those who took their places thanks to free slots? Conclusions: The Swiss system needs to be modified; a final should always be held in tournaments of this kind. Free slots, at a minimum, should be excluded for the winners; the winners facing losers should be excluded as well (they were all focused on the result, and I find it hard to imagine a situation where one of the participants would sell out to another in equal tournament conditions); game recordings should be kept (let's say on OBS, which allows almost any laptop to do it) for judging; the tournament regulations and rules should be improved; discipline regarding deadlines and in the venue should be enforced.