This is not news. What is the point of this conversation? Do you want some local official to write an official permission for everyone to use Artu as they see fit?

Not as they see fit, but within the established rules, which should be based on logically understandable, long battles. As an excellent logician, you should understand this :) And why are you picking on Artmoni? As far as I know, VDV also said that there are many other real-time automation and optimization tools. It's a matter of taste – the main thing is to achieve results and save personal time, but within the rules of the game, as I said above. Cheat programs are like an analog of an automation tool, but with the rights of an automation tool. Verification based on descriptions. If someone exceeds the permissible limits of using the automation tool, the punishment will be at the discretion of the administration. But in this case, everyone will be on equal footing, both in terms of application and punishment for improper use. How much more clearly can I explain this – I don't understand.

I don't think this will happen... I can't understand what you are trying to achieve...

Perhaps it is difficult to deviate from standards, especially with such vehement misunderstanding of the issue.

To convey to the players the information that at least one person among us will use officially prohibited methods of the game? You conveyed this half a year ago, and everyone has already come to terms with this fact. What's next? State your ultimate goal, otherwise we're just going in circles again...

As you can see, the information was not correctly understood by everyone :) The fact is that officially prohibited methods of the game do not actually do ANYTHING prohibited by the rules of the game itself, but their prohibition only forces players who want to play for results to hammer away at the keyboard for many hours, performing monotonous actions of moving pieces back and forth :) Of course, these methods can be used to commit an illegal action that violates the rules of the game itself – for example, to win an impossible battle. But for such cases, there are checks for both saves and checks based on descriptions. And they are more reliable than identifying which automation tool the player used to pass a battle that was obviously passable.

Added 5 minutes ago
:smile19: Deleted :smile19:
Kyle: please refrain from personal attacks!