Skip to content

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

User Avatar
#1362
Auto-translated
I didn't have much time to write immediately because I was initially in shock and couldn't say anything coherent, and then I got busy.
I have a few questions for the AK, or rather, for the part of it that voted in favor.
Were you led to believe that this was a bug? Or did you simply decide to ignore it and accept it as a fact? Dirty and his followers persistently claim that this is a bug in the HD mod, and Baratorch supposedly acknowledged it. Don't you find it distasteful to twist concepts to make the interpretation of this absurd decision seem at least somewhat legitimate in the eyes of the public, or do you not even realize that you're doing it? I ask everyone who stated that this is a bug and that Baratorch acknowledged it to point me to the relevant post (I'm giving a minimal chance that I might have missed it somewhere).
When RC8 was released, it was stated that mice with DPI higher than 2000 might experience lag, and to prevent this lag, a setting in the HD mod should be disabled. In RC9, this setting was simply disabled by default. What bug are we talking about, gentlemen? You claim this is a technical problem with Hell's game. After reading the above, do you still believe that?
Has anyone even tried to understand the situation? Or, upon seeing the word "bug" from Dirty and his comments that Baratorch acknowledged the bug, did everyone simply throw their hands up in the air? We played with this patch with mutual consent. HellLight's mouse was obviously used with his consent, as was the enabled setting (I don't think it makes sense to argue that the player is responsible for the HD mod settings).
Once again, clearly and concisely: this is not a bug; it's the configuration settings in the .ini file and HellLight's hardware.
At least have the decency to call things by their proper names.
Furthermore, you say, let him practice in a safe environment where there's a guarantee that, in a panic situation, he would have enough of those 5-10 seconds, or however much time was lost due to this "bug," and that he would actually make that decision, rather than sitting in confusion/indecision for those 5-10 seconds?
Considering these facts, how could such a decision have been made, and then complainingly raise his head, saying that we, the poor AK, won't do everything the right way? It would have been different if you had understood the situation and provided arguments. But in reality, you wrote a unanimous decision: it was a bug. On the one hand, it was short and clear; on the other hand, there wasn't a single word of truth in that sentence.
I repeat, since you are making decisions, at least have the decency to call things by their proper names.
241-568-808

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem