Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
a terrible example I would have said that if one figure tries to eat another, percentages would apply, although this would be the case with any other defense, so both options are bad for chess if players enjoy spending the night trying to kill each other, and during the day they enjoy playing roles with immunity from the first execution, then that's fine. The problem isn't the randomness, but the fact that the GM gave a lot of defenses, and that's not so bad.
Okay, you checkmated the king, but the king's 0.1% defense triggered, he eats your queen, and then in another part of the field, you get checkmated and your king's defense doesn't trigger. Honestly, I don't see the difference; I still have no desire to play something like that.