Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
These are essentially all the arguments against randomness, summarized.
In my opinion, these are very strong arguments. There's a clear case of pure, helpless frustration when randomness leaves you with absolutely no chance, no matter how well and skillfully you play... Isn't this a reason to minimize such moments, even if they can't be completely eliminated? Agree, Heroist, if in chess your opponent could randomly move a pawn from a2 to eat the king on e8, just like that, bad luck... No one in their right mind would play such chess.