Secondly... this belief is not destructive - or rather, not entirely destructive, as it preaches the idea that "the end justifies the means" (the higher good at the cost of the death of thousands from the upper classes - an idea of world revolution that Marx himself shared) - but as an ideological organization, it has the character of a destructive cult (for those who are not aware - a destructive cult differs from an ordinary one in that it actively introduces depersonalization and suppresses the human personality; in ordinary cults, its transformation is assumed - the personality is considered a value, but the existence of certain ideals that can ennoble the personality is also recognized).

Listen, how much more can we talk about things you haven't seen? Suppression of personality? And now, apparently, conditions are being created for its development? Culture must be at its peak? In the once "most literate country," they have already forgotten how to write in their native language, let alone read.
By the way, about the personalities of the Soviet period: think about it, in those days, outstanding scientists, artists, writers, etc. received apartments in a prestigious high-rise building on Krasnaya Presnya (well, the very one in which, in "Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears," the heroines portrayed themselves as professors' daughters... an impressive Tower). Who can afford an apartment there now - you can guess. Certainly not cultural figures (unless they are such "luminaries of talent" as Kirkorov).
By the way, people like to talk about the rigid equalization at the level of official ideology... did you watch the film "Spring" with Orlova? A film from Stalin's time. And it clearly shows that outstanding scientists live in two-story (!) apartments and have housekeepers - in other words, servants. And everyone knew that self-made people could achieve this. This was openly promoted.

Added 21 minutes ago

If you were a man, I could talk to you as equals, but since you're not, "I should learn how to talk to girls" :)

And you try to learn to look at people as equals, regardless of gender. That is, do not introduce offensive phrases of a personal nature into the discussion. I didn't initially send you anywhere or say that I feel sorry for you that "there are people who like to be slaves to a totalitarian order, who are willing to wear rose-colored glasses, watch what they are shown, and do what they are told"... These are personal attacks. Don't talk to me "as equals" like that.

Your post is poisonous and full of sarcasm, quite unpleasant.

Your post, to which I was responding, also did not bring me pleasure.

And by the way, dear lady, you should know that I don't tolerate *** as much as I don't tolerate communism.

For your information, I typed three asterisks, and nothing more. Feel free to substitute any word, starting with "fig," with your own imagination. Whether it was worth writing about what you can't stand is up to you. I personally find all this off-topic discussion depressing.