Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
OptiMALStatistics
Registered:
Posts:939
#217
Auto-translated
Alan;85405
Believe me, any reasonably competent commander, at a certain level of military technology development, would sit on a hill and, observing the battle, give orders to the troops. And this isn't outrageous; it's simply foolish to allow oneself to die from a random bullet/arrow (Napoleon, Kutuzov, for example; if either of them had died in the middle of the war for no reason, we would be living in a different world).
Well, it's a "Heroes" game, and heroes are heroes everywhere:D But I agree with you about the lack of competent commanders, but in battle, all soldiers are important! And it's simply necessary to get to the hero, because if a unit doesn't have a general, that's already a defeat. And in Heroes 3, you can't even get to the hero. And I was also annoyed that the units can't move. Why? They're not chained to their generals! (For example, for scouting). One unit can do the same job as a hero who is used for scouting. And losing a scout unit won't be as painful as losing a hero.