Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
WiccStatistics
Registered:
Posts:5,092
#9
Auto-translated
Scorpiona
I would really like to hear detailed opinions from those who oppose the changes, why???
1) The main advantage of SoD compared to mods is its classic gameplay. Yes, it's flawed and unbalanced, but it's familiar to a wide range of people, including those who have never played online.
Gems and Nagashnik, or changing the quick-cast algorithm, are tolerable because they fall under the category of "fixing bugs," but restructuring the guild is unfortunately not.
2) There's a psychological aspect to it: in SoD, finding control is like winning the lottery; it's a small celebration, and it evokes pleasant emotions, which is also why people play SoD. But for these emotions to arise, a person must value this, see it as luck, and for this, they need to occasionally enter the 2nd month with 5 built guilds without control in them. Guaranteed control is something like a salary - it's nice, of course, but it doesn't evoke any special emotions; it's just routine...
3) Restructuring is not planned for HotA (there are other ideas), so it's strange to see SoD running ahead of the curve.
4) Mirror templates exist for balancing purposes.