Actaea

Stop. That's correct. But – you claim that the difference in financial status (which is expressed, among other things, in clothing) in some cases can lead to a child being bullied. Hence, aggression, hence the lack of pacifism. Is that right? ) If not, then the uniform will not have any positive effect on pacifism.

I understand what you're getting at.
"You claim that the difference in financial status (which is expressed, among other things, in clothing) in some cases can lead to a child being bullied. Hence, aggression, hence the lack of pacifism. Is that right?" Yes, exactly.
There is a problem: poverty.
There is a consequence of it, which is also a problem: a child is bullied at school because of their clothes.
You say: the root is in the first problem.
I say: I agree with you, but the uniform should not solve the first problem; it solves the second.
You see, you could ignore the second problem, solve the first, and the second will solve itself. But at a minimum, the first is solved at the state level over decades, and the second is solved at the school level in one month. And your suggestion to "look at the root" will not help the child who is being bullied because of their clothes. He will have already finished school by the time you eradicate poverty.

In the case of lions, albinism in a lion is a problem in itself, and not its external manifestation. Painting the lions is one way to solve it, albeit a rather crude one, but it solves the problem.

No, no, no, no, no! :D
A painted lion remains an albino. Painting also only solves the external manifestation, but not the problem. The paint will eventually come off. But if it's like in Nationstates, "thousands of mini-abortions until a normal one is born," or changing the gene pool – that solves the problem.

) I was saying that it is a problem of everything, of all factors, including the uniform. I may be wrong... But still, my own modest experience tells me that things are stored in the subconscious that you may not even consciously notice. This is especially true in childhood. It's not a problem. Not some kind of nightmare that needs to be urgently solved and all that. But in the future, it may have an impact, and therefore it is better to at least take even such small things into account.

A very delicate matter. It may have an impact? Well, maybe.
I would reason like this. Is there a direct cause-and-effect relationship? A child is beaten and humiliated at school -> he will grow up with complexes.
But I can't say that about the uniform. Well, perhaps, under certain circumstances, it may have a bad effect. But on the other hand, just as easily, the absence of a uniform under certain circumstances can turn a child into a spoiled narcissist, etc.
Ment, it's all very subtle. I'm not convinced, sorry.