Actaea

Everything you said is called "asking," not "forcing."
I'm talking about an economic blockade, a complete ban on the import of high technologies, weapons, and so on. Unlike Cuba, which had the USSR, and North Korea, which has China, this pressure could have a greater effect.

Ah, I see... But there are also some problems here:
1) Once again, the Steelmen are legally correct.
2) If the Security Council functions normally, they can indeed be "asked," not "forced." Only then will the "ask" have legal force. There are two consequences: first, a sense of legality, the need to follow the law. If they don't comply, there is almost a 100% guarantee that coercive measures can now be used, because no country, seeing such a violation of the law, will stand up for the aggressor. And it won't remain silent.

Of course, one can argue that these methods will only work against a state that has something to lose. But it is also certain that not all natural resources are available in sufficient quantities, and not all technologies are advanced. And besides the economy, there is also politics, culture, and sports. At the very least, there is a reason to think about it.

Yes, indeed, there is also this aspect. And regarding foreign interventions for the first version of the Security Council, it is really possible to forget about them, even if Revan provided for them in the regulations (apparently, he didn't). And they will most likely not care about sanctions.
Good quotes, Aretz.