Actaea

Example. There is the UN, and the member countries have signed certain agreements (primarily related to their membership). Suddenly, out of nowhere, another UN appears and declares, "This UN is not the real one; ours is the real one!" Does that sound silly? Yes, it does. And that's exactly what it is. In our case, this is not just "some other organization whose membership no one has forbidden me to join"; it is precisely a clone of an already existing Security Council.
- It pursues similar goals.
- It has a similar structure.
- It even has the same name in the end.
In this case, one of the two identical organizations will always be illegitimate (it's like having two different governments in one country).

It wasn't intended to sound smart; it's just Mushrooms ) However.

It pursues similar goals.

It doesn't. It doesn't aim for dialogue between all the countries of Actaea regarding peace.

It has a similar structure.

The structure is similar. The regulations are different, and many things differ. It has different, more reasonable powers, in the end. Your Security Council will be useless in many cases, while the real Security Council of Actaea will, in most cases, only need to issue a formal resolution, and the issue will be resolved. Theoretically, of course, because in practice, the old Security Council, which has already outlived its usefulness, will somewhat hinder this function, but this can be corrected over time.

Another example. Let's say there is NATO. Ukraine really wants to join it. What should it do? It should try in every way to achieve its membership. And how does it happen in this game? Ukraine creates its own NATO and invites the current members of this organization to become its members.

First, NATO is a different alliance with different goals. Second, most likely (99%), they have a direct ban on joining other military alliances there. Third, I'm already poaching your Heroist from COSAP. And finally, NATO doesn't have an urgent need for a replacement, as it is functioning normally.
I'm saying this as if on behalf of the state, but in other words )

It's a great idea, by the way. It's a pity that the government didn't come up with it. Mushrooms turned out to be smarter.

))

It even has the same name in the end.

Oh yes, well, it's clear here. You took a collective name, "Actaea." If you hadn't taken it, there would be no problem. But you did. It's like creating an organization called the UN, but including only America, France, and Canada, for example. No, these are good countries, with good goals... But... Why create an organization with the claim to regulate relations around the world if it only includes three countries? It's the same here.
In this case, the Mushrooms implemented a good idea, but it was not fully realized by those who proposed it.