The Lord of the Rings

Yeah, but the application describes the time leading up to the main confrontation with the Ring and after it. Although Arwen's appearance in the film is indeed justified; there has to be at least one beautiful elf (oh, I love such brunettes).

Well, Glorfindel isn't a character who drives the plot, but Arwen could have been included as a way to introduce her to the audience. I also felt uneasy during my first viewing, but then I thought about it and came to the conclusion that it's justified. Her washing away of the Nazgûl – let's think about how this could have been done differently. The Nazgûl are simply washed away – it's unclear. The Nazgûl are washed away, and at the same time, Gandalf is shown reciting spells – it's cheesy. Arwen washes away the Nazgûl – it's not canon, but it's acceptable (Tolkien has many female mages or warriors: Éowyn, Lúthien, Galadriel, and nothing is said about Arwen being a homebody).

And looking at him, do you believe that he is the wise and beautiful descendant of Beren and Lúthien (the most beautiful of those born in Arda), in whose veins flows the blood of the Maia Melian, etc.?

If we abstract from the actor, yes. During my first viewing, I didn't notice the connection between him and Smith, and he didn't cause me any dislike.

One can (?) argue about how he played the role and what he conveyed, but the fact is that he doesn't look very much like Tolkien's Aragorn, at least according to such banal parameters as height and build.

Show me the data on the height and build of the Ranger!

In many places. For example, rewatch the scene where Gandalf appears before the group in the Fangorn Forest (2nd film); I cried.

- I'll rewatch it and tell you.

A three, nothing special, exactly what you could expect in a blockbuster.

- normal doesn't mean bad.

Big budget.

- and where does it say that this is bad?

A cliché that they shove in everywhere after Braveheart. Although the music is still one of the few positive aspects.

- that's it!