Auto-translated
People, come to your senses, and be grateful that someone is spending their personal time to make things interesting for us. Be more understanding.
Right now, the problem is that he isn't spending time on the tournament.
Let's call a spade a spade. Pit is running this tournament terribly.
The rules haven't been published. Now, additional metrics will be taken into account, but there's simply no document outlining them.
Pit disappeared for two or three weeks and failed to meet the deadlines he himself set, allowing two weeks for the tournament. The playoffs should have started two weeks ago. And when he reappeared, he couldn't answer when the tournament would end.
He recruited people for the organizing committee but didn't give them the authority to resolve issues. These people weren't absent, but the answer to every question was: Pit makes all the decisions.
And today, he failed to meet his own deadlines again.
Given this kind of attitude from the organizer towards the tournament, it seems strange to demand any discipline from the participants. And it seems that they aren't even demanding it anymore, which is also not good.
I don't really understand why he doesn't step down from his organizational role if he doesn't have enough time. Why doesn't he give his assistants more authority? But since he doesn't, shouldn't he be held accountable?
ICQ 423164784