Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
2) You know, but here, how to judge whether the person being "mocked" is being treated rudely or not – from my point of view, it’s rude in both cases, from the point of view of some abstract “homeless Vasya” – both examples are just a funny joke, not very understandable because it lacks profanity.
As you wish. If you are used to getting offended over trivial things, okay. I have nothing bad to say about it; yes, we are all different, and completely different things can offend us, we need to adapt to each other. I just want to point out that it will be difficult for others to adapt to you in this case, so don’t judge too harshly if someone accidentally offends you, okay? But we need to adapt, and we will try.
3) I have been dealing with the fact that people don’t really understand “impersonal” examples for many years. Most people perceive an insult as an insult only if it is directed at them or their close friends and family, but in general...
Impersonal examples will be perfectly understandable, unlike ambiguous phrases that can be considered an insult (at least a very inappropriate joke).
Well, let’s do it – I gave you a link – are there any more comments on the setting, or can we proceed in this form?
Okay. In this form, it’s still difficult to proceed, but it’s okay, we’ll refine it. I believe in you.)
So, look. The description, unfortunately, does not reveal the essence at all. I would not describe all these incomprehensible and insignificant events for the game if I were you. Your task, as a GM, is to provide a description of basic concepts (not even basic concepts of the world as a whole, but only those basic concepts that are important for the game, this is important!), as well as events that directly preceded the events of the mafia and, therefore, will affect the plot in the newspapers. Something like that. Introduction, plot… Like in a regular literary work.
The descriptions of the roles are mostly nothing. In principle, it’s brief and clear. Only the priest’s description is missing for some reason. The Mord-Sid description is shifted to the right of the picture, which is not good for the format. In general, it would be better to refine it a little; the wording is strange, specifically for them. Although, in general, it’s understandable. And something like that. In principle, nothing…
So, now here’s something else. I might have missed it, and if so, I apologize, but I’ll ask. How does a “complete victory” differ from a “victory”? And is it even worth introducing such a thing?
I would format the lines regarding the gift, passive ability, and ND so that it is clearly visible.
Well, something like that.