Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
To be honest, I didn't read it.
1) H2SO4 first writes 3 loss reports for game 111 and effectively withdraws from the tournament, and then starts explaining what he didn't like.
Even if I agree with his arguments, I no longer have the opportunity to reinstate him in the tournament.
2) The decision to switch to a chess timer was made by the entire forum; there were 3 votes determining its parameters, and all future tournaments were planned to be held with a chess timer. The fact that there was no checkbox: "for a classic timer" is not an argument. No one prevented him from creating his own topic: **"Let's preserve the classic timer!"** with his own vote.
3) Blackmailing with withdrawal from the tournament and slamming the door doesn't work.