Okay, I'll answer.
Regarding Rebellius's statement that "In the last round, I had a game with Cobra, and we played from August 12th to 17th every day" – all the saves on the 12th and 13th were at your initiative, on the 14th you didn't play, and on the 15th, the save was also at your initiative. Then you decided to pressure him, because Cobra immediately told you that he couldn't play on the weekends, but you decided to act differently. After learning that the deadline was on Saturday, you started insisting on playing PRECISELY ON SATURDAY. Cobra again went along with it and played from his dacha (again, the save was at your request). Then you refused to play and said, "Let them decide," meaning you tried your best to not finish this match.
Furthermore, you were given a deadline, and Pete monitored the game. According to him, each of your turns took many times longer than Cobra's. Then, again, the save was at your request.
The match was very ambiguous. Initially, it was heading towards three possible outcomes; after the last save, it was down to two (your victory was not considered – either Cobra wins or it's a draw), but giving you more time to finish the game would have been too much, so that decision was made.

I only hear Cobra's defender, and the arguments are only from Cobra. Did you even bother to ask for my opinion? That is, you used only the arguments of one side in making the decision and didn't even bother to question the other. This indicates that my opinion wasn't needed.
And doesn't Cobra know the rules, and was it news to him that there's a deadline on Saturdays in tournaments? As it says, if you can't, then this tournament isn't for you. Why did you omit the main game factors – the game's duration? And if Cobra can't win, it's only natural that he can only get half a point, not talk about how he's accommodating everyone. In reality, you're dragging the game out to cosmic lengths, trying to squeeze out some bonuses for Cobra. And during the last playthrough, Cobra was sending me messages in ICQ asking how much longer I could play, and he actually needed to leave earlier than me, but he tried to make it seem like I was the one initiating the save. But he didn't say that with his mobile internet, he had a bad ping and it was impossible to play, and several times the saves failed to load, wasting a lot of time?
And also, dear judge, political motives related to the current difficult situation were used in making the decision, which you yourself confirmed, and that this is also an element of the game. Or are we outside of politics?