Pit for LM
Auto-translated
If an opponent disappears from the game and then does not respond to offers to finish the game within a certain period (a couple of weeks or a month), simply declare victory in the season and don't worry about it. Why start a witch hunt and create some kind of lists?
Or have you decided to take on a part-time job as a confirmer of other people's defeats?
You can read about the rules of conduct for players in such situations here:
1.6. Players are advised to agree in advance how long they will be able to play without interruption, and if there is insufficient time and a need to postpone the game, agree on the deadlines for finishing the game.
One month is given to finish the game. If the game is not finished during this time, the players may apply to the tournament judge, providing saves of the postponed game and ICQ logs. Each case is considered individually. The judge acts at his discretion: either a technical victory is awarded (if one of the players ignores offers to finish the game), or a decision is made based on the saves (if both players have problems), or the game is canceled, or another decision is made depending on the circumstances. Sanctions up to and including exclusion from the tournament and inclusion in the Blacklist may be applied to players who systematically do not finish postponed games.
forcing these people to follow the rules... it’s just not interesting…
…let's somehow mark them. like an icon under their avatar "this person doesn't finish games"...
…they're really annoying now. let's create lists. even if someone hasn't finished a game once, put them on the list right away.
Judges prefer to first understand the situation, find out the reasons for the unfinished game, and identify the culprit, and only then draw up lists, mark with icons, etc.
The algorithm is as follows: started, paused, offer to finish, it doesn't work out, contact the judge privately with saves and logs. THAT'S IT. Nothing more is required from the player. All lists on the forum are compiled by the administration, the Arbitration Committee (AK), and the organizers of the tournaments.
Chingis, this rule has already been quoted to you; if you are not interested in it, no one is going to force you. But if there are no complaints from players, who should be added to the lists?
I suggest that we stop discussing this issue further on the forum, even in the Tribune, where, although off-topic and flooding are allowed, trolling and flaming are still prohibited and assessed by moderators as 5 points of violation. All complaints should be sent privately to the judges of the tournament in which the game was played.