Diabler didn't break any rules, and I already provided an example of Heroin's violation, so the result is clear.
The claim "aren't you red-rushing?" is clearly not a violation – the player has the right to make any claim, and if the opponent disagrees, the matter is referred to the judge. In this case, the opponent agreed.
Even if Heroin intentionally bluffed towards Diabler, it wouldn't be a violation of the game rules, but merely unethical behavior. If he genuinely didn't know (and in the absence of a way to verify this, we should believe him), then game ethics were not violated either.
