Strange answer. It's obvious that the purpose of the question was to understand the cause-and-effect relationship of this decision.

I thought you were capable of understanding this relationship yourself, being an organizer of Tournaments, so I found the question strange.

I think AYMAN won't mind if I quote him almost verbatim regarding the Castle map: the Castle map is the most unbalanced and random map, but I still like it.

But does that mean that Ayman is not of sound mind?

What's more, even in the "Novichok" tournament, people are asking to remove the Castle map from the decisive matches.

Apparently, you know the situation in Novichok better than I do. According to my information, the first game of the super final (where there is a pattern of maps) was played on the Castle map. Why didn't they remove it themselves?

I don't know why this personally affects you so much.

Personally, it doesn't affect me at all; I also had a period when I couldn't bring myself to play on the Castle map, although I didn't notice any super imbalances on it; you just need experience playing on it, as with any other map.

So that in the future there are no more rules that restrict "fairness."

There is no "fairness" in life; it is a subjective concept. I already wrote that the rules for choosing maps in the Champions League seem less fair to me than in the official league. So, you have to come to terms with the subjective opinion about "fairness" of each individual organizer. There is an excellent opportunity to avoid unfairness - don't play in the tournament.