Forum

Guys, what made you decide that I was refusing to confirm the match? The more I read, the more confused I become; the correspondence is right there. Apparently, I'll have to explain in more detail, since many people don't seem to understand the meaning, and they start making things up about others (especially those comments about being a crybaby and other nonsense). So, this is a fun game (a season game), and I play it solely for the sake of playing (not for the result). In this case, I decided to practice with Jebus before the start of the corresponding tournament. For me, the game ended after I destroyed my opponent's army while keeping my own intact. Two angels on the mage don't prevent Tazar from taking the center; this is obvious, but my opponent doesn't give up... This moment was the sticking point for me; from my point of view, it's similar to a situation in some RTS where one player destroys the opponent's base, but the opponent still has a couple of units hidden somewhere and refuses to surrender, saying, "Find them." Dragging out the game when the opponent clearly has an advantage contradicts my gaming ethics; I surrender myself if I see that the opponent has a decisive advantage (as in the game with Yurist, for example, and not only). The opponent decided to play "until the bitter end." After that, there were two options: leave or try to push with my army. I tried, but it wasn't enough, so we saved the game because I was already exhausted (this is not an excuse, but simply an explanation of my state at that moment; everything that happens in the game has no bearing on what happened before, and I didn't write anywhere that "oh, I wasn't paying attention, I wouldn't have done that, let's replay"). With a clear head, I realized that I didn't want to drag out this game, and I told my opponent that when he suggested finishing it. He sarcastically asked, "Don't you see any chances?" There are quite normal chances; even if he manages to hold out until the end of the week, he won't be able to defeat Tazar in the castle because I still have enough troops, and he won't be able to do much in the center with one angel. Now, briefly, the main points, for those who are just catching up: - I think Tazar played better in the game. - I definitely don't want to finish the game now (regarding confirmation, please read the correspondence). - I didn't touch on the opponent's personal qualities anywhere; I don't understand where the negativity and the attribution of "self-aggrandizement" came from. In Toganash's first post, there's a lot of resentment, a lot of personal perception, and even made-up things, but there's no specific information. What is the essence of the topic starter's claims? What is the essence of the claims of those who have already started giving assessments, and what does this have to do with judging?